Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424417›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Multi-sensory feedback improves spatially compatible sensori-motor responses.

A Dechaux, M Haytam-Mahsoub, M Kitazaki, J Lagarde, G Ganesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A DechauxUM-CNRS Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), 161, Rue Ada, Montpellier, France. amaury.dechaux@lirmm.fr.
M Haytam-MahsoubUM-CNRS Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), 161, Rue Ada, Montpellier, France.
M KitazakiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan.
J LagardeEuromov Digital Health in Motion (DHM) Laboratory, University of Montpellier, 700 Avenue du Pic Saint Loup, Montpellier, France.
G GaneshUM-CNRS Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), 161, Rue Ada, Montpellier, France. ganesh.gowrishankar@lirmm.fr.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 15K12623JST ERATO JPMJER1701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To interact with machines, from computers to cars, we need to monitor multiple sensory stimuli, and respond to them with specific motor actions. It has been shown that our ability to react to a sensory stimulus is dependent on both the stimulus modality, as well as the spatial compatibility of the stimulus and the required response. However, the compatibility effects have been examined for sensory modalities individually, and rarely for scenarios requiring individuals to choose from multiple actions. Here, we compared response time of participants when they had to choose one of several spatially distinct, but compatible, responses to visual, tactile or simultaneous visual and tactile stimuli. We observed that the presence of both tactile and visual stimuli consistently improved the response time relative to when either stimulus was presented alone. While we did not observe a difference in response times of visual and tactile stimuli, the spatial stimulus localization was observed to be faster for visual stimuli compared to tactile stimuli.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryTouchHumansReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID36424417
PMCPMC9691706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.