Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424332›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2023

Crush: A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Impact of a Mobile Health App on Adolescent Sexual Health.

Genevieve Martínez-García, Alexander C Ewing, Yewande Olugbade, Ralph J DiClemente, Athena P Kourtis

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Genevieve Martínez-GarcíaHealthy Teen Network, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: genevievemartine@gmail.com.
Alexander C EwingDivision of Reproductive Health, Maternal and Infant Health Branch, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, Georgia.
Yewande OlugbadeDepartment of Innovation & Research, Healthy Teen Network, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ralph J DiClementeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York.
Athena P KourtisEpidemiology Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia.
Healthy Teen Network · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · USNew York University · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMobile technology allows delivery of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information directly to youth. We tested the efficacy of Crush, a mobile application aimed at improving sexual health by promoting the use of SRH services and contraception among female adolescents.

methodsWe recruited 1,210 women aged 14-18 years through social media advertising and randomized them into a Crush intervention group and a control group that received a wellness app. At 3 and 6 months post randomization, we compared changes from baseline in behaviors, attitudes, self-efficacy, perceived social norms, birth control knowledge, perceived control and use intentions, and SRH service utilization. Odds ratios were estimated with multivariable logistic regression and adjusted for baseline outcome, age, race/ethnicity, mother's education, and sexual experience.

resultsThere was no difference in accessing SRH services according to study group. Three months post baseline, Crush users had higher odds (p < .05) than control participants of reporting confidence in accessing SRH services (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.3) and of believing that it is a good thing to use birth control consistently (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-3.8). Six months after baseline, Crush users had higher odds than control participants of reporting they can control whether birth control is used every time they have sex (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.6) and perceiving they would get pregnant if they did not use birth control (aOR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2). Impacts on other behavioral constructs were also found. DISCUSSION: Crush was associated with improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy related to key SRH behaviors and may be a strategy to deliver SRH education to adolescent women. Studies including larger numbers of sexually active adolescents are needed to demonstrate behavioral impacts.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSexual HealthAdolescentContraceptionFemaleHumansPregnancyReproductive HealthSex EducationSexual BehaviorMobile appSexual healthTechnologyTeen pregnancy prevention

Identifiers

PMID36424332
PMCPMC11036548
OpenAlexW4309769239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.