SynthesisBMJ open2022
Costs associated with retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinopathy of prematurity screening and treatment practice patterns: an African multi-country survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Cost-utility analysis of retinopathy of prematurity screening strategies of universal referral, RetCam telemedicine, and direct examination in Iran: a markov model approach.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- External validation and updating of DIGIROP prediction models including parenteral nutrition for treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity in a Swedish national cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Oxygen blenders for prevention of retinopathy of prematurity are highly cost-effective in Uganda.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity development and progression in the Philippines.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The social and economic burden of retinopathy of prematurity: screening, treatment, and health policy perspectives in a transnational narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Modelling direct healthcare costs for screening and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity among infants born at gestational age <24 weeks: findings from a Swedish cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in South Africa: are those developing severe ROP screened on time? Data from a prospective register.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Tear Proteomics in Infants at Risk of Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Feasibility Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Retinopathy of Prematurity-Targeting Hypoxic and Redox Signaling Pathways.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Screening and surveillance for retinopathy of prematurity: A Wilson and Jungner framework approach.Journal of global health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo review and analyse evidence regarding costs for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening, lifetime costs and resource use among infants born preterm who develop ROP, and how these costs have developed over time in different regions.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Scopus from inception to 23 June 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Included studies presented costs for ROP screening and the lifetime costs (including laser treatment and follow-up costs) and resource use among people who develop ROP. Studies not reporting on cost calculation methods or ROP-specific costs were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened for inclusion and extracted data, including items from a published checklist for quality assessment used for bias assessment, summary and random-effects meta-analysis for treatment costs. Included studies were further searched to identify eligible references and citations.
resultsIn total, 15 studies reported ROP screening costs, and 13 reported lifetime costs (either treatment and/or follow-up costs) for infants with ROP. The range for screening costs (10 studies) was US$5-US$253 per visit, or US$324-US$1072 per screened child (5 studies). Costs for treatment (11 studies) ranged from US$38 to US$6500 per child. Four studies reported healthcare follow-up costs (lifetime costs ranging from US$64 to US$2420, and 10-year costs of US$1695, respectively), and of these, three also reported lifetime costs for blindness (range US$26 686-US$224 295) using secondary cost data. Included papers largely followed the quality assessment checklist items, thus indicating a low risk of bias.
conclusionThe costs of screening for and treating ROP are small compared with the societal costs of resulting blindness. However, little evidence is available for predicting the effects of changes in patient population, screening schedule or ROP treatments. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020208213.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.