Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424118›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Costs associated with retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hanna Gyllensten, Jhangir Humayun, Ulrika Sjöbom, Ann Hellström, Chatarina Löfqvist

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retinopathy of prematurity screening and treatment practice patterns: an African multi-country survey.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna GyllenstenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden hanna.gyllensten@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-5162
Jhangir HumayunInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-8216
Ulrika SjöbomInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Ann HellströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9259-1244
Chatarina LöfqvistInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review and analyse evidence regarding costs for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening, lifetime costs and resource use among infants born preterm who develop ROP, and how these costs have developed over time in different regions.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Scopus from inception to 23 June 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Included studies presented costs for ROP screening and the lifetime costs (including laser treatment and follow-up costs) and resource use among people who develop ROP. Studies not reporting on cost calculation methods or ROP-specific costs were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers screened for inclusion and extracted data, including items from a published checklist for quality assessment used for bias assessment, summary and random-effects meta-analysis for treatment costs. Included studies were further searched to identify eligible references and citations.

resultsIn total, 15 studies reported ROP screening costs, and 13 reported lifetime costs (either treatment and/or follow-up costs) for infants with ROP. The range for screening costs (10 studies) was US$5-US$253 per visit, or US$324-US$1072 per screened child (5 studies). Costs for treatment (11 studies) ranged from US$38 to US$6500 per child. Four studies reported healthcare follow-up costs (lifetime costs ranging from US$64 to US$2420, and 10-year costs of US$1695, respectively), and of these, three also reported lifetime costs for blindness (range US$26 686-US$224 295) using secondary cost data. Included papers largely followed the quality assessment checklist items, thus indicating a low risk of bias.

conclusionThe costs of screening for and treating ROP are small compared with the societal costs of resulting blindness. However, little evidence is available for predicting the effects of changes in patient population, screening schedule or ROP treatments. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020208213.

Indexed as

Retinopathy of PrematurityBlindnessChildHealth Care CostsHumansInfantInfant, Newbornhealth economicsmedical retinapaediatric ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID36424118
PMCPMC9693652
OpenAlexW4309930496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.