Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36424032›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Imaging endpoints for clinical trial use: a RECIST perspective.

Saskia Litière, Jan Bogaerts

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. P53 Competitively Binds P300 to Suppress HIF-1α/TFRC-Mediated Ferroptosis and Promote Doxorubicin Resistance in Breast Cancer.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of RECIST v1.1 for predicting overall survival in sarcoma patients with pulmonary metastasis.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saskia LitièreEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium saskia.litiere@eortc.org.
Jan BogaertsEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twenty years after its initial introduction, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) remains today a unique standardized tool allowing uniform objective evaluation of response in solid tumors in clinical trials across different treatment indications. Several attempts have been made to update or replace RECIST, but none have realized the general traction or uptake seen with RECIST. This communication provides an overview of some challenges faced by RECIST in the rapidly changing oncology landscape, including the incorporation of PET with

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicHumansResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Biomarkers, TumorBiostatisticsClinical Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID36424032
PMCPMC9693866
OpenAlexW4309912792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.