Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423803›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain and symptom management2023

Design Considerations for Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials of Advance Care Planning Interventions for Persons Living With Dementia.

Sandra Shi, Emily A Largent, Ellen McCreedy, Susan L Mitchell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra ShiHebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S.S., S.L.M.), Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Sandrashi@hsl.harvard.edu.
Emily A LargentUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine (E.A.L.), Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ellen McCreedyBrown University School of Public Health (E.M.), Providence, RI, USA.
Susan L MitchellHebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research (S.S., S.L.M.), Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexia Mary Torke · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
UNDERSTANDING HOW THE STUDY PARTNER REQUIREMENT IMPACTS THE DISCOVERY AND TRANSLATION OF PRECLINICAL ALZHEIMERS DISEASEK01AG064123 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LARGENT, EMILY · 2019 to 2023
$637k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG064123NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of comprehensive care for persons living with dementia (PLWD). While many trials have established the efficacy of ACP in improving end-of-life communication and documentation of care preferences, there remains a gap in clinical usage. Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) may facilitate the uptake of evidence-based care into existing healthcare by deploying efficacious ACP interventions into real-world settings. However rigorous conduct of ePCTs of ACP for PLWD presents several unique methodological considerations. Here we describe a framework for the construction of these research studies, with a focus on distinguishing between the target of study: the PLWD, their care partners, or both. We outline specific considerations at each step of the research study process including 1) participant identification/eligibility, 2) participant recruitment/enrollment, 3) intervention implementation, and 4) outcome selection/ascertainment. These considerations are weighed in further detail by describing the approaches from three published trials. Specifically, we consider how potential challenges were overcome by tradeoffs in study design. Finally, we offer directions for future growth to advance ePCTs for ACP among PLWD and catalyze future research.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDementiaCommunicationDocumentationHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicAdvance care planningCare partnersDementiaPragmatic trials

Identifiers

PMID36423803
PMCPMC9875559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.