Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423442›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia research2022

A psychological intervention for engaging dialogically with auditory hallucinations (Talking With Voices): A single-site, randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Eleanor Longden, Dirk Corstens, Samantha Bowe, Melissa Pyle, Richard Emsley, Sarah Peters, Alison Branitsky, Nisha Chauhan, Nikki Dehmahdi, Wendy Jones and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. An excitement building in the development of psychological treatments for schizophrenia.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Shaman and Schizophrenia, Revisited.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleanor LongdenPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: Eleanor.Longden@gmmh.nhs.uk.
Dirk CorstensGGZ Noord-Holland Noord, Texel/den Helder, the Netherlands.
Samantha BowePsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Melissa PylePsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Richard EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Sarah PetersDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alison BranitskyPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Complex Trauma and Resilience Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nisha ChauhanPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Nikki DehmahdiPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Wendy JonesPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Natasha HoldenPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Amanda LarkinPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Alissa MinersPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Elizabeth MurphyPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Ann SteelePsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Anthony P MorrisonPsychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBGGZ Noord-Holland-Noord · NLKing's College London · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing clinical interest in addressing relationship dynamics between service-users and their voices. The Talking With Voices (TwV) trial aimed to establish feasibility and acceptability of a novel dialogical intervention to reduce distress associated with voices amongst adults diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The single-site, single-blind (rater) randomised controlled trial recruited 50 participants who were allocated 1:1 to treatment as usual (TAU), or TAU plus up to 26 sessions of TwV therapy. Participants were assessed at baseline and again at end of treatment (six-months). The primary outcomes were quantitative and qualitative assessments of feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes involved clinical measures, including targeted instruments for voice-hearing, dissociation, and emotional distress. The trial achieved 100 % of the target sample, 24 of whom were allocated to therapy and 26 to TAU. The trial had high retention (40/50 [80 %] participants at six-months) and high intervention adherence (21/24 [87.5 %] receiving ≥8 sessions). Signals of efficacy were shown in targeted measures of voice-hearing, dissociation, and perceptions of recovery. Analysis on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale indicated that there were no differences in means of general psychosis symptom scores in TwV compared to the control group. There were four serious adverse events in the therapy group and eight in TAU, none of which were related to study proceedings. The trial demonstrates the acceptability of the intervention and the feasibility of delivering it under controlled, randomised conditions. An adequately powered definitive trial is necessary to provide robust evidence regarding efficacy evaluation and cost-effectiveness. Trial registration: ISRCTN 45308981.

Indexed as

Psychosocial InterventionPsychotic DisordersAdultFeasibility StudiesHallucinationsHumansSingle-Blind MethodDissociationHearing Voices MovementPsychotherapySchizophreniaTreatment outcome research

Identifiers

PMID36423442
PMCPMC9754007
OpenAlexW4309501858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.