Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423306›Full record

ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2022

Frailty, Comorbidity, and Associations With In-Hospital Mortality in Older COVID-19 Patients: Exploratory Study of Administrative Data.

Johannes Heyl, Flavien Hardy, Katie Tucker, Adrian Hopper, Maria J M Marchã, Annakan V Navaratnam, Tim W R Briggs, Jeremy Yates, Jamie Day, Andrew Wheeler and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Johannes HeylDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-8796
Flavien HardyGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-8744
Katie TuckerInnovation and Intelligent Automation Unit, Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7931-7101
Adrian HopperGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4852-5223
Maria J M MarchãScience and Technology Facilities Council Distributed Research Utilising Advanced Computing High Performance Computing Facility, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-5538
Annakan V NavaratnamUniversity College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-9464
Tim W R BriggsGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-8385
Jeremy YatesDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-8749
Jamie DayGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-3396
Andrew WheelerGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-8342
Sue Eve-JonesGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7698-0346
William K GrayGetting It Right First Time programme, National Health Service England and National Health Service Improvement, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9597-5446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults have worse outcomes following hospitalization with COVID-19, but within this group there is substantial variation. Although frailty and comorbidity are key determinants of mortality, it is less clear which specific manifestations of frailty and comorbidity are associated with the worst outcomes.

objectiveWe aimed to identify the key comorbidities and domains of frailty that were associated with in-hospital mortality in older patients with COVID-19 using models developed for machine learning algorithms.

methodsThis was a retrospective study that used the Hospital Episode Statistics administrative data set from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, for hospitalized patients in England aged 65 years or older. The data set was split into separate training (70%), test (15%), and validation (15%) data sets during model development. Global frailty was assessed using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and specific domains of frailty were identified using the Global Frailty Scale (GFS). Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Additional features employed in the random forest algorithms included age, sex, deprivation, ethnicity, discharge month and year, geographical region, hospital trust, disease severity, and International Statistical Classification of Disease, 10th Edition codes recorded during the admission. Features were selected, preprocessed, and input into a series of random forest classification algorithms developed to identify factors strongly associated with in-hospital mortality. Two models were developed; the first model included the demographic, hospital-related, and disease-related items described above, as well as individual GFS domains and CCI items. The second model was similar to the first but replaced the GFS domains and CCI items with the HFRS as a global measure of frailty. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and measures of model accuracy.

resultsIn total, 215,831 patients were included. The model using the individual GFS domains and CCI items had an AUROC curve for in-hospital mortality of 90% and a predictive accuracy of 83%. The model using the HFRS had similar performance (AUROC curve 90%, predictive accuracy 82%). The most important frailty items in the GFS were dementia/delirium, falls/fractures, and pressure ulcers/weight loss. The most important comorbidity items in the CCI were cancer, heart failure, and renal disease.

conclusionsThe physical manifestations of frailty and comorbidity, particularly a history of cognitive impairment and falls, may be useful in identification of patients who need additional support during hospitalization with COVID-19.

Indexed as

agecancercomorbiditycoronavirusCOVID-19deathdescriptive statisticsdiseaseelderethnicityfrailtygeriatricheartheart failurehospitalhospital admissionhospitalisationhospitalizationmachine learningmodelmortalityolder adultpatientrenal diseaseSARS-CoV-2sexsupportweightweight loss

Identifiers

PMID36423306
PMCPMC9746678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.