Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423143›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

CoreGenes5.0: An Updated User-Friendly Webserver for the Determination of Core Genes from Sets of Viral and Bacterial Genomes.

Patrick Davis, Donald Seto, Padmanabhan Mahadevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bacteriophage Taxonomy: A Continually Evolving Discipline.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Three VirulentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrick DavisDepartment of Biology, The University of Tampa, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.
Donald SetoDepartment of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, VA 20110, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-0330
Padmanabhan MahadevanDepartment of Biology, The University of Tampa, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of core genes in viral and bacterial genomes is crucial for a better understanding of their relatedness and for their classification. CoreGenes5.0 is an updated user-friendly web-based software tool for the identification of core genes in and data mining of viral and bacterial genomes. This tool has been useful in the resolution of several issues arising in the taxonomic analysis of bacteriophages and has incorporated many suggestions from researchers in that community. The webserver displays result in a format that is easy to understand and allows for automated batch processing, without the need for any user-installed bioinformatics software. CoreGenes5.0 uses group protein clustering of genomes with one of three algorithm options to output a table of core genes from the input genomes. Previously annotated "unknown genes" may be identified with homologues in the output. The updated version of CoreGenes is able to handle more genomes, is faster, and is more robust, providing easier analysis of custom or proprietary datasets. CoreGenes5.0 is accessible at coregenes.org, migrating from a previous site.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyData Miningbacteriabioinformaticscoregenesgenomicsviruseswebserver

Identifiers

PMID36423143
PMCPMC9693508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.