Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423083›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2022

A Quadruplex qRT-PCR for Differential Detection of Four Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses.

Hongjin Zhou, Kaichuang Shi, Feng Long, Kang Zhao, Shuping Feng, Yanwen Yin, Chenyong Xiong, Sujie Qu, Wenjun Lu, Zongqiang Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Research Advances on Swine Acute Diarrhea Syndrome Coronavirus.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongjin ZhouCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Kaichuang ShiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Feng LongGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.
Kang ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3568-8231
Shuping FengGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.
Yanwen YinGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.
Chenyong XiongCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Sujie QuGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.
Wenjun LuGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530001, China.
Zongqiang LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China.
Guangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control · CNGuangxi University · CN

Funding

Guangxi Science and Technology Bureau, China AB21238003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), and swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV) are four identified porcine enteric coronaviruses. Pigs infected with these viruses show similar manifestations of diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration. Here, a quadruplex real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) assay was established for the differential detection of PEDV, TGEV, PDCoV, and SADS-CoV from swine fecal samples. The assay showed extreme specificity, high sensitivity, and excellent reproducibility, with the limit of detection (LOD) of 121 copies/μL (final reaction concentration of 12.1 copies/μL) for each virus. The 3236 clinical fecal samples from Guangxi province in China collected between October 2020 and October 2022 were evaluated by the quadruplex qRT-PCR, and the positive rates of PEDV, TGEV, PDCoV, and SADS-CoV were 18.26% (591/3236), 0.46% (15/3236), 13.16% (426/3236), and 0.15% (5/3236), respectively. The samples were also evaluated by the multiplex qRT-PCR reported previously by other scientists, and the compliance rate between the two methods was more than 99%. This illustrated that the developed quadruplex qRT-PCR assay can provide an accurate method for the differential detection of four porcine enteric coronaviruses.

Indexed as

detection methodmultiplex qRT-PCRporcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV)porcine enteric coronavirusporcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV)swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV)transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV)

Identifiers

PMID36423083
PMCPMC9695440
OpenAlexW4309118563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.