Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423072›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Stakeholder Perspectives of Australia's National HPV Vaccination Program.

Caitlin Swift, Aditi Dey, Harunor Rashid, Katrina Clark, Ramesh Manocha, Julia Brotherton, Frank Beard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Designing School-Based Cancer Education for Sustained Behavioural Change.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Knowledge and Awareness of HPV, the HPV Vaccine and Cancer-Related HPV Types among Indigenous Australians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caitlin SwiftNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Aditi DeyNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Harunor RashidNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2286-5139
Katrina ClarkNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Ramesh ManochaHealthed, Sydney, NSW 1805, Australia.
Julia BrothertonNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.
Frank BeardNational Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia.

Funding

CSRD VA 1the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australia has been a world leader in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and was the first country to implement a fully funded national HPV vaccination program, from 2007 for girls and 2013 for boys. In 2018 the program changed from a 4-valent to 9-valent HPV vaccine and a 3-dose to 2-dose standard schedule. We assessed stakeholder perspectives on factors influencing program outcomes and impact as part of a comprehensive program evaluation. In late 2019 and early 2020, we conducted 26 interviews with 42 key stakeholder participants and received 1513 survey responses from stakeholders including general practice staff and school-based nurse immunisers. Findings included that the 2-dose schedule is better accepted by schools and students and has reduced program cost and resource requirements. However, course completion rates have not increased as much as anticipated due to the 6-12 month dosing interval and reduced opportunities for school-based catch-up vaccination. Major reported barriers to increased vaccine coverage were absenteeism and consent form return. Vaccine hesitancy is not currently a major issue but remains a potential threat to the program. While Australia's HPV vaccination program is perceived as highly successful, measures to further enhance the program's impact and mitigate potential threats are important.

Indexed as

evaluationHPV vaccinehuman papillomavirus (HPV)interviewsstakeholdersurveyvaccination program

Identifiers

PMID36423072
PMCPMC9692920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.