Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36423025›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Perceptions of COVID-19 Maternal Vaccination among Pregnant Women and Healthcare Workers and Factors That Influence Vaccine Acceptance: A Cross-Sectional Study in Barcelona, Spain.

Elena Marbán-Castro, Ivana Nedic, Mara Ferrari, Esther Crespo-Mirasol, Laia Ferrer, Berta Noya, Anna Marin, Victoria Fumadó, Marta López, Clara Menéndez and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena Marbán-CastroISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-0595
Ivana NedicISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2674-1782
Mara FerrariISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-3851
Esther Crespo-MirasolDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3800-3672
Laia FerrerASSIR Esquerra, Gerència Territorial de Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, 08015 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-3400
Berta NoyaASSIR Esquerra, Gerència Territorial de Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, 08015 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9360-1718
Anna MarinISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Victoria FumadóISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Marta LópezDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Clara MenéndezISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina Martínez BuenoASSIR Barcelona Ciutat, Gerència Territorial de Barcelona, Institut Català de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain.
Anna LlupiàISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Anna GoncéDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, BCNatal-Barcelona Center of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Azucena BardajíISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ESHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESInstitut Català de la Salut · ESManhiça Health Research Centre · MZ

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI19/01346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is associated with poor maternal and pregnancy outcomes. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended in Spain, yet vaccination rates in pregnancy are suboptimal. This study investigates the perceptions of pregnant women and healthcare workers (HCW) regarding COVID-19 vaccination. A web-based cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted in 2021-2022 among 302 pregnant women and 309 HCWs in the Catalan public health system. Most pregnant women (83%) and HCWs (86%) were aware of COVID-19 maternal vaccines. The recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccination by an HCW was identified as the greatest facilitator for maternal vaccine uptake, while the fear of harming the foetus was the most significant barrier reported for rejecting vaccination. HCWs recognised they received limited information and training about COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, which hindered them from providing informed recommendations. This study highlights that information and education on COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women and health professionals are pivotal to ensuring informed decision-making and increasing vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19maternal immunisationvaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36423025
PMCPMC9692476
OpenAlexW4309118994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.