Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422988›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of surgery2023

Relationship between surgical volume and outcomes in elective and acute cholecystectomy: nationwide, observational study.

My Blohm, Gabriel Sandblom, Lars Enochsson, Mats Hedberg, Mikael Franko Andersson, Johanna Österberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Bile Duct Injury and Litigation in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Global Review of Current and Future Preventative Initiatives.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

My BlohmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0457-5165
Gabriel SandblomDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, South General Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7416-4951
Lars EnochssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-4736
Mats HedbergDepartment of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden.
Mikael Franko AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, South General Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johanna ÖsterbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-5477
Karolinska Institutet · SEUppsala University · SEMora lasarett · SE

Funding

Centre for Clinical Research CKFUU-697181Stockholm County Council 20190336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh surgical volumes are attributed to improved quality of care, especially for extensive procedures. However, it remains unknown whether high-volume surgeons and hospitals have better results in gallstone surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether operative volume affects outcomes in cholecystectomies.

methodsA registry-based cohort study was performed, based on the Swedish Registry of Gallstone Surgery. Cholecystectomies from 2006 to 2019 were included. Annual volumes for the surgeon and hospital were retrieved. All procedures were categorized into volume-based quartiles, with the highest group as reference. Low volume was defined as fewer than 20 operations per surgeon per year and fewer than 211 cholecystectomies per hospital per year. Differences in outcomes were analysed separately for elective and acute procedures.

resultsThe analysis included 154 934 cholecystectomies. Of these, 101 221 (65.3 per cent) were elective and 53 713 (34.7 per cent) were acute procedures. Surgeons with low volumes had longer operating times (P < 0.001) and higher conversion rates in elective (OR 1.35; P = 0.023) and acute (OR 2.41; P < 0.001) operations. Low-volume surgeons also caused more bile duct injuries (OR 1.41; P = 0.033) and surgical complications (OR 1.15; P = 0.033) in elective surgery, but the results were not statistically significant for acute procedures. Low-volume hospitals had more bile duct injuries in both elective (OR 1.75; P = 0.002) and acute (OR 1.96; P = 0.003) operations, and a higher mortality rate after acute surgery (OR 2.53; P = 0.007).

conclusionThis study has demonstrated that operative volumes influence outcomes in cholecystectomy. The results indicate that gallstone surgery should be performed by procedure-dedicated surgeons at hospitals with high volumes of this type of benign surgery.

Indexed as

GallstonesSurgeonsCholecystectomyCohort StudiesHospitalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36422988
PMCPMC10364541
OpenAlexW4309908774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.