Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422958›Full record

ReviewToxins2022

Varespladib in the Treatment of Snakebite Envenoming: Development History and Preclinical Evidence Supporting Advancement to Clinical Trials in Patients Bitten by Venomous Snakes.

Matthew R Lewin, Rebecca W Carter, Isabel A Matteo, Stephen P Samuel, Sunita Rao, Bryan G Fry, Philip E Bickler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chinese cobra (Naja atra) SVPLACommunications biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Toxins · 2026
    Article
  13. Snake Venom PLAToxins · 2025
    Review
  14. Varespladib attenuatesRedox report : communications in free radical research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew R LewinDivision of Research, Ophirex, Inc., Corte Madera, CA 94925, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4480-9891
Rebecca W CarterDivision of Research, Ophirex, Inc., Corte Madera, CA 94925, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5977-7338
Isabel A MatteoCenter for Exploration and Travel Health, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Stephen P SamuelDivision of Research, Ophirex, Inc., Corte Madera, CA 94925, USA.
Sunita RaoDivision of Research, Ophirex, Inc., Corte Madera, CA 94925, USA.
Bryan G FryVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Science, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-1283
Philip E BicklerCenter for Exploration and Travel Health, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
California Academy of Sciences · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of effective, reliably accessible, and affordable treatments for snakebite envenoming is a critical and long unmet medical need. Recently, small, synthetic toxin-specific inhibitors with oral bioavailability used in conjunction with antivenom have been identified as having the potential to greatly improve outcomes after snakebite. Varespladib, a small, synthetic molecule that broadly and potently inhibits secreted phospholipase A2 (sPLA2s) venom toxins has renewed interest in this class of inhibitors due to its potential utility in the treatment of snakebite envenoming. The development of varespladib and its oral dosage form, varespladib-methyl, has been accelerated by previous clinical development campaigns to treat non-envenoming conditions related to ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, sepsis, and acute coronary syndrome. To date, twenty-nine clinical studies evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of varespladib for non-snakebite envenoming conditions have been completed in more than 4600 human subjects, and the drugs were generally well-tolerated and considered safe for use in humans. Since 2016, more than 30 publications describing the structure, function, and efficacy of varespladib have directly addressed its potential for the treatment of snakebite. This review summarizes preclinical findings and outlines the scientific support, the potential limitations, and the next steps in the development of varespladib's use as a snakebite treatment, which is now in Phase 2 human clinical trials in the United States and India.

Indexed as

Snake BitesAcetatesAntiveninsBiological AvailabilityHumansIndiaIndolesKeto AcidsAcetatesAntiveninsIndolesKeto AcidsvarespladibantivenomASVinhibitorLY315920LY333013preclinicalvarespladib

Identifiers

PMID36422958
PMCPMC9695340
OpenAlexW4309012918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.