Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422699›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2023

Prospecting and engineering yeasts for ethanol production under inhibitory conditions: an experimental design analysis.

Viviani Tadioto, Junior Romeo Deoti, Caroline Müller, Bruna Raquel de Souza, Odinei Fogolari, Marcela Purificação, Anderson Giehl, Letícia Deoti, Ana Carolina Lucaroni, Akinori Matsushika and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Second-generation biorefinery: a Brazilian perspective.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Viviani TadiotoLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Junior Romeo DeotiLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Caroline MüllerLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-9355
Bruna Raquel de SouzaLaboratory of Yeast Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Odinei FogolariLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-2490
Marcela PurificaçãoLaboratory of Yeast Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Anderson GiehlLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Letícia DeotiLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Ana Carolina LucaroniLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.
Akinori MatsushikaDepartment of Biotechnology and Chemistry, Kindai University-Hiroshima Campus, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-2875
Helen TreichelLaboratory of Microbiology and Bioprocesses, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Erechim, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3810-3000
Boris Ugarte StambukLaboratory of Yeast Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. boris.stambuk@ufsc.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-1020
Sergio Luiz Alves JuniorLaboratory of Yeast Biochemistry, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil. slalvesjr@uffs.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-971X
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRHiroshima City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently discovered wild yeast Wickerhamomyces sp. UFFS-CE-3.1.2 was analyzed through a high-throughput experimental design to improve ethanol yields in synthetic media with glucose, xylose, and cellobiose as carbon sources and acetic acid, furfural, formic acid, and NaCl as fermentation inhibitors. After Plackett-Burman (PB) and central composite design (CCD), the optimized condition was used in a fermentation kinetic analysis to compare this yeast's performance with an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain (JDY-01) genetically engineered to achieve a higher xylose fermentation capacity and fermentation inhibitors tolerance by overexpressing the genes XYL1, XYL2, XKS1, and TAL1. Our results show that furfural and NaCl had no significant effect on sugar consumption by UFFS-CE-3.1.2. Surprisingly, acetic acid negatively affected glucose but not xylose and cellobiose consumption. In contrast, the pH positively affected all the analyzed responses, indicating a cell's preference for alkaline environments. In the CCD, sugar concentration negatively affected the yields of ethanol, xylitol, and cellular biomass. Therefore, fermentation kinetics were carried out with the average concentrations of sugars and fermentation inhibitors and the highest tested pH value (8.0). Although UFFS-CE-3.1.2 fermented glucose efficiently, xylose and cellobiose were mainly used for cellular growth. Interestingly, the genetically engineered strain JDY-01 consumed ~ 30% more xylose and produced ~ 20% more ethanol. Also, while UFFS-CE-3.1.2 only consumed 32% of the acetic acid of the medium, JDY-01 consumed > 60% of it, reducing its toxic effects. Thus, the overexpressed genes played an essential role in the inhibitors' tolerance, and the applied engineering strategy may help improve 2G ethanol production.

Indexed as

CellobioseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeEthanolFermentationFuraldehydeGlucoseKineticsResearch DesignSodium ChlorideXyloseCellobioseEthanolFuraldehydeGlucoseSodium ChlorideXyloseAcetic acidFermentationGlucoseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeWickerhamomyces sp.Xylose

Identifiers

PMID36422699
OpenAlexW4309884197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.