Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422671›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Prognostic models for estimating survival of salivary duct carcinoma: a population-based study.

Di Zhang, Lixi Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Di ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chaoyang District, Panjiayuan nanli No.17, Beijing, 100021, China.
Lixi LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chaoyang District, Panjiayuan nanli No.17, Beijing, 100021, China. 13552075722@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-5052
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn a large salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) cohort, we aimed to investigate the clinical factors influencing their survival outcomes and to further establish prognostic models.

methodsData of patients with SDC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1975-2019). A retrospective analysis was conducted to explore the prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), and corresponding nomograms were established.

resultsA steady upward trend in the incidence of SDC was observed over the past four decades. Totally, 399 patients (280 in the training set and 199 in the testing set) were enrolled. Advanced T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and surgery were associated with favorable OS and DSS. Besides, age > 80 years exhibited worse OS. The selected variables above were used to construct nomograms and online web calculators that could accurately predict patient survival. In addition, risk stratification systems were generated to identify low- and high-risk patients. As the risk level increased, the risk of both patient mortality and disease-specific mortality increased.

conclusionsThe SDC incidence was low, but steadily increasing. The proposed prognostic models provided a robust and efficient approach to predict survival and risk stratification in SDC patients.

Indexed as

CarcinomaSalivary Gland NeoplasmsAged, 80 and overHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSalivary DuctsSEER ProgramMajor salivary glands carcinomaNomogramPrognosisRisk stratificationSalivary duct carcinomaSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Identifiers

PMID36422671
OpenAlexW4309891643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.