Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422668›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2023

Smartphone video nystagmography using convolutional neural networks: ConVNG.

Maximilian U Friedrich, Erich Schneider, Miriam Buerklein, Johannes Taeger, Johannes Hartig, Jens Volkmann, Robert Peach, Daniel Zeller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maximilian U FriedrichDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Friedrich_M6@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3695-1268
Erich SchneiderBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus, Senftenberg, Germany.
Miriam BuerkleinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes TaegerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Johannes HartigDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Jens VolkmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Robert Peach *Department of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Peach_R@ukw.de.
Daniel Zeller *Department of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider Strasse 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Project-ID 424778381Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR 295IZKF Wuerzburg AdvCSP-4IZKF Wuerzburg Z2-CSP13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye movement abnormalities are commonplace in neurological disorders. However, unaided eye movement assessments lack granularity. Although videooculography (VOG) improves diagnostic accuracy, resource intensiveness precludes its broad use. To bridge this care gap, we here validate a framework for smartphone video-based nystagmography capitalizing on recent computer vision advances.

methodsA convolutional neural network was fine-tuned for pupil tracking using > 550 annotated frames: ConVNG. In a cross-sectional approach, slow-phase velocity of optokinetic nystagmus was calculated in 10 subjects using ConVNG and VOG. Equivalence of accuracy and precision was assessed using the "two one-sample t-test" (TOST) and Bayesian interval-null approaches. ConVNG was systematically compared to OpenFace and MediaPipe as computer vision (CV) benchmarks for gaze estimation.

resultsConVNG tracking accuracy reached 9-15% of an average pupil diameter. In a fully independent clinical video dataset, ConVNG robustly detected pupil keypoints (median prediction confidence 0.85). SPV measurement accuracy was equivalent to VOG (TOST p < 0.017; Bayes factors (BF) > 24). ConVNG, but not MediaPipe, achieved equivalence to VOG in all SPV calculations. Median precision was 0.30°/s for ConVNG, 0.7°/s for MediaPipe and 0.12°/s for VOG. ConVNG precision was significantly higher than MediaPipe in vertical planes, but both algorithms' precision was inferior to VOG.

conclusionsConVNG enables offline smartphone video nystagmography with an accuracy comparable to VOG and significantly higher precision than MediaPipe, a benchmark computer vision application for gaze estimation. This serves as a blueprint for highly accessible tools with potential to accelerate progress toward precise and personalized Medicine.

Indexed as

Nystagmus, PathologicSmartphoneBayes TheoremEye MovementsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerComputer visionDigital medicineEye movement disordersNystagmusPrecision medicineTelemedicineVideooculography

Identifiers

PMID36422668
PMCPMC10129923
OpenAlexW4309923431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.