ArticleHeart and vessels2023
Implication of modified MELD scores for postdischarge prognosis in hospitalized patients with heart failure.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of preoperative MELD-Na score versus APRI for postoperative outcomes after infrainguinal bypass in peripheral artery disease.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Combination of sST2/LVMI Ratio and Modified MELD Scores Predicts Mortality in End-Stage Heart Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Prognostic factors in patients with heart failure and sarcopenia: an observational retrospective study.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- The association between the MELD-XI score and heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction after coronary artery stenting-a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated whether modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are useful for predicting the postdischarge prognosis in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) who are discharged alive. The MELD-XI and MELD-Na scores were calculated at discharge for a total of 1156 patients in the HIJ-HF II study. We also studied 3 groups on the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): the HFrEF (LVEF < 40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 40-49%) and HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%) groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was rehospitalization due to worsening HF. The median MELD-XI and MELD-Na scores were 12 and 14, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19 months, there were significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality in patients with MELD-XI scores ≥ 12 than in those with MELD-XI scores < 12; there were also higher rates of all-cause mortality in patients with MELD-Na scores ≥ 14 than in those with MELD-Na scores < 14 (both log-rank p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence function based on a competing risks model showed a higher rate of rehospitalization due to worsening HF in patients with MELD-XI scores ≥ 12 than in those with MELD-XI scores < 12 and a higher rate of rehospitalization due to worsening HF in those with MELD-Na scores ≥ 14 than in those with MELD-Na scores < 14 (both Gray's test p < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality for patients with MELD-XI scores ≥ 12 and those with MELD-Na scores ≥ 14 were 2.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-3.44] and 2.79 [95% CI 1.63-4.79], respectively, in the HFrEF group; however, the HRs were not significant in the HFmrEF or HFpEF groups. Thus, MELD-XI and MELD-Na scores may be useful for predicting prognosis in hospitalized HF patients who are discharged alive, especially for those in the HFrEF group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36422651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.