ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2022
Copy number variations in patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: an arrayCGH approach.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Copy Number Variations in a Case with Intractable Epilepsy, Intellectual Disability, and Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies Having a 17p12 Deletion.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is not always possible to determine the causative basis of pregnancy losses and even today it has been reported that 50% of cases with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) have no reason to be detected. In our study, it is aimed to reveal the copy number variations (CNVs) of the genes which presumably have a potential effect in individuals with RPL and contribute to subsequent functional studies in the follow-up.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) data of cytogenetically 64 normal individuals (21 couples, 11 unrelated women, and 11 unrelated men) who had applied to our outpatient clinic from January 2016 to December 2017, for the history of idiopathic two or more RPL.
resultsA total of 83 CNVs were detected in 56 different chromosomal regions [36% (20/56) is deletion and 64% (36/56) is duplication] in 40/64 (62.5%) of the cases. Two detected deleterious CNVs encompassing 1p36.22-p36.21 and 10q11.22 chromosomal locus have been reported as pathogenic according to the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV). DISCUSSION: CNVs that may play a role in the genetic etiology of idiopathic RPL were revealed in our study and potential chromosomal loci were introduced to the literature for further analysis. The detection of CNVs and their association with reproduction such as RPL, infertility, and even other diseases will allow us to have more information about the clinical consequences and will make it possible to provide more accurate and comprehensive genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.