Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422492›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2022

Comparison of anakinra and tocilizumab in management of severe COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

Orhan Küçükşahin, Abdulsamet Erden, Özlem Karakaş, Serdar Can Güven, Berkan Armağan, Enes Şeyda Şahiner, Osman İnan, Ali Can Kurtipek, Emin Gemcioğlu, Selma Karaahmetoğlu and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Orhan KüçükşahinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abdulsamet ErdenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.
Özlem KarakaşClinic of Rheumatology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Serdar Can GüvenClinic of Rheumatology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Berkan ArmağanClinic of Rheumatology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Enes Şeyda ŞahinerClinic of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Osman İnanClinic of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ali Can KurtipekClinic of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Emin GemcioğluClinic of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Selma KaraahmetoğluClinic of Internal Medicine, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Sema TuranClinic of Intensive Care Unit, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Seval İzdeşDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation-Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.
Deniz ErdemClinic of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Adalet AypakClinic of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Müge AyhanClinic of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Esragül AkıncıDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Hürrem BodurDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Rahmet GünerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet OmmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
İhsan AteşDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ministry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies regarding effectiveness of anakinra and tocilizumab treatments in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have contradictory results. Furthermore, there is scarce comparative data regarding superiority of any agent. To further elucidate any superiority between these two agents, we retrospectively investigated and compared outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients of our inpatient cohort who received anakinra or tocilizumab.

methodsThis study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who had Brescia-COVID respiratory severity scale score ≥3 and hyperinflammation (defined as elevation of C reactive protein ≥50 g/L or ferritin ≥700 ng/mL) and received anakinra or tocilizumab in addition to standard care were enrolled in the study. Length of hospital stay after initiation of antiinflammatory treatment, need for mechanical ventilation, need for intensive care unit admission, mortality were set as primary outcomes and compared between tocilizumab and anakinra recipients after propensity score matching.

resultsOne hundred and six patients were placed in each group after propensity score matching. In the anakinra group, relative risk reduction for intensive care unit admission was 50% when compared to the tocilizumab group and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 3 (95% CI, 2-5). In terms of mortality, a 52% relative risk reduction was observed with anakinra treatment and the number needed to treat to avert an intensive care unit admission was 8 (95% CI, 4-50). Significantly more patients were observed to receive glucocorticoids in the anakinra group. DISCUSSION: Anakinra administration in severe COVID-19 patients was significantly associated with better survival and greater clinical improvement compared to the tocilizumab administration in our study. Increased rate of glucocorticoid use in the anakinra group might have contributed to better outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteintocilizumabanakinraCOVID-19cytokine stormhyperinflammationtocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID36422492
PMCPMC10395730
OpenAlexW4310335074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.