Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422312›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Simulating the Environmental Spread of SARS-CoV-2 via Cough and the Effect of Personal Mitigations.

Claire Bailey, Paul Johnson, Josh Moran, Iwona Rosa, Jodi Brookes, Samantha Hall, Brian Crook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire BaileyHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-1204
Paul JohnsonHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
Josh MoranHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
Iwona RosaHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
Jodi BrookesHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
Samantha HallHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
Brian CrookHealth and Safety Executive Science and Research Centre, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
HSE Science and Research Centre · GB

Funding

HM Government PROTECT COVID-19 National Core Study on transmission and environment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA cough is known to transmit an aerosol cloud up to 2 m. During the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS), other UK government agencies and the World Health Organization (WHO) advised people to cough into their elbows. It was thought that this would reduce viral spread and protect the public. However, there is limited peer reviewed evidence to support this.

objectivesTo determine if cough related interventions reduce environmental contamination, protecting members of the public from infection.

methodsScientists and engineers at the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) laboratory used a human cough simulator that provided a standardised cough challenge using a solution of simulated saliva and a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus; Phi6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Viable virus spread up to 2 m from the origin of the cough outwards in a cloud. Recommended interventions, such as putting a hand or elbow in front of the mouth changed the pattern of cough aerosol dispersion. A hand deflected the cough to the side, protecting those in front from exposure, however it did not prevent environmental contamination. It also allowed for viral transfer from the hand to surfaces such as door handles. A balled fist in front of the mouth did not deflect the cough. Putting an elbow in front of the mouth deflected the aerosol cloud to above and below the elbow, but would not have protected any individuals standing in front. However, if the person coughed into a sleeved elbow more of the aerosol seemed to be absorbed. Coughing into a bare elbow still allowed for transfer to the environment if people touched the inside of their elbow soon after coughing.

conclusionsInterventions can change the environmental contamination pattern resulting from a human cough but may not reduce it greatly.

Indexed as

coughCOVID-19dropletsmitigationvirus transmission

Identifiers

PMID36422312
PMCPMC9696866
OpenAlexW4309005744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.