Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422083›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Photoactivated Chromophore Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Infectious Keratitis (PACK-CXL)-A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Factors Involved in Therapeutic Indications and Contraindications.

Ileana Ramona Barac, Andrada-Raluca Artamonov, George Baltă, Valentin Dinu, Claudia Mehedințu, Anca Bobircă, Florian Baltă, Diana Andreea Barac

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Challenges and Therapeutic Prospects in Eye Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ileana Ramona BaracDepartment of Ophthalmology/ENT, Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.
Andrada-Raluca ArtamonovBucharest Emergency Eye Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania.
George BaltăDepartment of Ophthalmology/ENT, Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.
Valentin DinuDepartment of Ophthalmology/ENT, Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-0019
Claudia MehedințuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.
Anca BobircăDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6662-7354
Florian BaltăDepartment of Ophthalmology/ENT, Faculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.
Diana Andreea BaracFaculty of Medicine, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050747 Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious keratitis is a severe infection of the eye, which requires urgent care in order to prevent permanent complications. Typical cases are usually diagnosed clinically, whereas severe cases also require additional tools, such as direct microscopy, corneal cultures, molecular techniques, or ophthalmic imaging. The initial treatment is empirical, based on the suspected etiology, and is later adjusted as needed. It ranges from topical administration of active substances to oral drugs, or to complex surgeries in advanced situations. A novel alternative is represented by Photoactivated Chromophore Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL), which is widely known as a minimally invasive therapy for corneal degenerations. The purpose of this review is to identify the main diagnostic and prognostic factors which further outline the indications and contraindications of PACK-CXL in infectious keratitis. Given the predominantly positive outcomes in the medical literature, we ponder whether this is a promising treatment modality, which should be further evaluated in a systematic, evidence-based manner in order to develop a clear treatment protocol for successful future results, especially in carefully selected cases.

Indexed as

corneal ulcerinfectious keratitisPACK-CXLPhotoactivated Chromophore Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking

Identifiers

PMID36422083
PMCPMC9698237
OpenAlexW4309315764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.