ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Systems Biology Approach for Personalized Hemostasis Correction.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- In silico analysis of patient specific coagulation and flow effects on fibrin clot formation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Critical evaluation of kinetic schemes for coagulation.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The correction of blood coagulation impairments of a bleeding or thrombotic nature employs standard protocols where the type of drug, its dose and the administration regime are stated. However, for a group of patients, such an approach may be ineffective, and personalized therapy adjustment is needed. Laboratory hemostasis tests are used to control the efficacy of therapy, which is expensive and time-consuming. Computer simulations may become an inexpensive and fast alternative to real blood tests. In this work, we propose a procedure to numerically define the individual hemostasis profile of a patient and estimate the anticoagulant efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) based on the computer simulation of global hemostasis assays. We enrolled a group of 12 patients receiving LMWH therapy and performed routine coagulation assays (activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time) and global hemostasis assays (thrombodynamics and thrombodynamics-4d) and measured anti-Xa activity, fibrinogen, prothrombin and antithrombin levels, creatinine clearance, lipid profiles and clinical blood counts. Blood samples were acquired 3, 6 and 12 h after LMWH administration. We developed a personalized pharmacokinetic model of LMWH and coupled it with the mechanism-driven blood coagulation model, which described the spatial dynamics of fibrin and thrombin propagation. We found that LMWH clearance was significantly lower in the group with high total cholesterol levels. We generated an individual patient's hemostasis profile based on the results of routine coagulation assays. We propose a method to simulate the results of global hemostasis assays in the case of an individual response to LMWH therapy, which can potentially help with hemostasis corrections based on the output of global tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.