Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36422072›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows.

Marco Montella, Giovanni Ciani, Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Francesca Grassi, Andrea Ronchi, Immacolata Cozzolino, Renato Franco, Federica Zito Marino, Fabrizio Urraro and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marco MontellaPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8588-7653
Giovanni CianiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy.
Francesca GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Andrea RonchiPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Immacolata CozzolinoPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Renato FrancoPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Federica Zito MarinoPathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio UrraroDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2284-0855
Riccardo MontiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Roberto SiricaAMES-Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, SRL, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Giovanni SavareseAMES-Centro Polidiagnostico Strumentale, SRL, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Ugo ChianeseDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2726-1895
Angela NebbiosoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5374-3527
Lucia AltucciDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7312-5387
Maria Teresa VietriDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Valerio NardoneDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-0965
Alfonso ReginelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Roberta GrassiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the qualitative relationship between liquid biopsy and conventional tissue biopsy. As a secondary target, we evaluated the relationship between the liquid biopsy results and the T stage, N stage, M stage, and compared to grading. Methods: The Local Ethics Committee of the “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, with the internal resolution number 24997/2020 of 12.11.2020, approved this spontaneous prospective study. According to the approved protocol, patients with lung cancer who underwent Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), CT-guided biopsy, and liquid biopsy were enrolled. A Yates chi-square test was employed to analyze differences in percentage values of categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the Matlab Statistic Toolbox (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Results: When a genetic mutation is present on the pathological examination, this was also detected on the liquid biopsy. ROS1 and PDL1 mutations were found in 2/29 patients, while EGFR Exon 21 was identified in a single patient. At liquid biopsy, 26 mutations were identified in the analyzed samples. The mutations with the highest prevalence rate in the study populations were: ALK (Ile1461Val), found in 28/29 patients (96.6%), EML4 (Lys398Arg), identified in 16/29 (55.2%) patients, ALK (Asp1529Glu), found in 14/29 (48.3%) patients, EGFR (Arg521Lys), found in 12/29 (41.4%) patients, ROS (Lys2228Gln), identified in 11/29 (37.9%) patients, ROS (Arg167Gln) and ROS (Ser2229Cys), identified in 10/29 (34.5%) patients, ALK (Lys1491Arg) and PIK3CA (Ile391Met), identified in 8/29 (27.6%) patients, ROS (Thr145Pro), identified in 6/29 (20.7%) patients, and ROS (Ser1109Leu), identified in 4/29 (13.8%) patients. No statistically significant differences can be observed in the mutation rate between the adenocarcinoma population and the squamous carcinoma population (p > 0.05, Yates chi-square test). Conclusions: We showed that, when a genetic mutation was detected in pathological examination, this was always detected by liquid biopsy, demonstrating a very high concordance rate of genomic testing between tissues and their corresponding mutations obtained by liquid biopsy, without cases of false-negative results. In addition, in our study, liquid biopsy highlighted 26 mutations, with the prevalence of ALK mutation in 96.6% of patients, supporting the idea that this approach could be an effective tool in cases with insufficient tumor tissue specimens or in cases where tissue specimens are not obtainable.

Indexed as

conventional biopsyliquid biopsylung cancer

Identifiers

PMID36422072
PMCPMC9698369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.