Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421938›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022

Review of Recent Laboratory and Experimental Data on Cardiotoxicity of Statins.

Aleksey M Chaulin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksey M ChaulinDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Samara State Medical University, 443099 Samara, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-0227
Institute of Cardiology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the fact that statins are among the most high-demand therapeutic agents used for the treatment and prevention of the most common cardiovascular diseases, a significant amount of research is focused on these drugs. As a result, the study and discovery of new effects in statin drugs continues. Research methods are constantly being improved in terms of their sensitivity and specificity, which leads to a change in ideas. In addition to the main lipid-lowering effect, statins have a number of additional effects, which can be conditionally divided into positive (pleiotropic) and negative (side effects). Moreover, information about many of the pleiotropic effects of statins is controversial and may subsequently change as new data become available. To a large extent, this is due to the introduction of new and the improvement of old methods of study: clinical, laboratory and morphological ones. Recent studies report the possibility of statins having potential cardiotoxic properties, which is expressed by an increase in the concentration of highly sensitive cardiac troponins, as well as various adverse changes in cardiac myocytes at the ultrastructural and molecular levels. This paper discusses possible mechanisms of statin cardiotoxicity. This narrative review is based on an analysis of publications in the Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central and Embase databases. The terms "statins", "troponin", "troponin I", "troponin T" in combination with "cardiotoxicity", "false positive", "mechanisms of increase", "pathophysiological mechanisms", "oxidative stress" and "cardiomyocyte apoptosis" were used to search publications.

Indexed as

cardiac troponinscardiotoxicitylaboratory diagnosticsmechanisms of cardiotoxicitystatins

Identifiers

PMID36421938
PMCPMC9696927
OpenAlexW4309737665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.