Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421913›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Exploring the Potential of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect Due to Stroke: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

Alex Martino Cinnera, Alessio Bisirri, Ilaria Chioccia, Enza Leone, Irene Ciancarelli, Marco Iosa, Giovanni Morone, Valeria Verna

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06264713 (Immersive Virtual REality for Treatment of Unilateral Spatial NEglect Due to Stroke Via Eye-tracking Biofeedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06264713 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Immersive Virtual REality for Treatment of Unilateral Spatial NEglect Due to Stroke Via Eye-tracking Biofeedback (IRENE Project): a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsNeglect, Hemispatial, StrokeArmsImmersive Virtual Reality, Sham Immersive Virtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex Martino CinneraScientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7267-3253
Alessio BisirriVilla Sandra Institute, 00148 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0485-8608
Ilaria ChiocciaFaculty of "Medicine and Surgery", Degree Course in Speech Therapy, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Enza LeoneSchool of Allied Health Professions, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
Irene CiancarelliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Marco IosaScientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-3887
Giovanni MoroneDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Valeria VernaScientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Health Care IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1000-7655
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Staffordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review aims to explore the use of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) in the treatment of visual perception in Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) after a stroke. PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Pedro databases were searched, from inception to 1 February 2022. All studies that investigated the effect of IVR on USN, such as outcome in the stroke population, have been included. The current comprehensive systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations and was registered in the PROSPERO database [CRD42022311284]. Methodological quality was assessed through JBI critical appraisal tool. A total of 436 articles were identified through the database searches. A total of 10 articles, with a heterogeneous study design, which involved 77 patients with USN with low-to-moderate methodological quality, have been selected. Five out the included studies tested usability of IVR for assessed or treated visual perception deficits in USN, comparing the results with 134 healthy subjects. In the rest of studies that tested IVR such as treatment, three showed statistical positive results (p < 0.05) in visual perception outcome. To date, the literature has suggested the potential benefits in the use of IVR for the treatment of visual perception disorders in USN. Interestingly, IVR motivates patients during the rehabilitation process improving compliance and interest. The heterogeneity in the studies’ design and in IVR treatments indicate the need of future investigations in the consideration of potentiality and low-cost of this technology.

Indexed as

immersive virtual realityrehabilitationstrokesystematic reviewunilateral spatial neglect

Identifiers

PMID36421913
PMCPMC9688364
OpenAlexW4309708920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.