ReviewBrain sciences2022
Neuromorphic-Based Neuroprostheses for Brain Rewiring: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives in Neuroengineering.
Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Neuromorphic Microstructures Control In Vitro Early-Stage Neuronal Outgrowth.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- logLIRA: a method for reliable suppression of electrical stimulation artifacts enabling short-latency neural response recovery.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Advancing neuroengineering with Neuromorphic Twins.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Editorial: Neuroengineering for health and disease: a multi-scale approach.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural vs Neuromorphic Interfaces: Where Are We Standing?Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Repetitive training enhances the pattern recognition capability of cultured neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Impact of ischemic lesion on sleep related connectivity in the sensorimotor cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Enabling Model-Based Design for Real-Time Spike Detection.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic neuromodulation: Towards the next generation of closed-loop neurostimulation.PNAS nexus · 2024Review
- NRV: An open framework for in silico evaluation of peripheral nerve electrical stimulation strategies.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Personalized strategies of neurostimulation: from static biomarkers to dynamic closed-loop assessment of neural function.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Real-time multicompartment Hodgkin-Huxley neuron emulation on SoC FPGA.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Living-Neuron-Based Autogenerator.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- On temporal scale-free non-periodic stimulation and its mechanisms as an infinite improbability drive of the brain's functional connectogram.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroprostheses are neuroengineering devices that have an interface with the nervous system and supplement or substitute functionality in people with disabilities. In the collective imagination, neuroprostheses are mostly used to restore sensory or motor capabilities, but in recent years, new devices directly acting at the brain level have been proposed. In order to design the next-generation of neuroprosthetic devices for brain repair, we foresee the increasing exploitation of closed-loop systems enabled with neuromorphic elements due to their intrinsic energy efficiency, their capability to perform real-time data processing, and of mimicking neurobiological computation for an improved synergy between the technological and biological counterparts. In this manuscript, after providing definitions of key concepts, we reviewed the first exploitation of a real-time hardware neuromorphic prosthesis to restore the bidirectional communication between two neuronal populations in vitro. Starting from that 'case-study', we provide perspectives on the technological improvements for real-time interfacing and processing of neural signals and their potential usage for novel in vitro and in vivo experimental designs. The development of innovative neuroprosthetics for translational purposes is also presented and discussed. In our understanding, the pursuit of neuromorphic-based closed-loop neuroprostheses may spur the development of novel powerful technologies, such as 'brain-prostheses', capable of rewiring and/or substituting the injured nervous system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.