ReviewBrain sciences2022
Thyroid Hormone Augmentation for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thyrotropin levels in first-episode bipolar disorder and their association with clinical phenotypes: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Thyroid hormone levels in patients with bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Thyroid hormone augmentation for bipolar disorder: a neurobiological and clinical narrative review.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2026Review
- Case Report: Treatment of subthreshold bipolar disorder in pregnancy: a report on the effectiveness of the Zamar ProtocolFrontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Twenty-four years of prescription patterns in bipolar disorder inpatients with vs without lithium: a pharmacoepidemiological analysis of 8,707 cases in German-speaking countries.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Review
- Longitudinal hair cortisol in bipolar disorder and a mechanism based on HPA dynamics.iScience · 2024Article
- Endocrinological Treatment Targets for Depressive Disorder.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Collecting Contributions for a Critical Issue: Progressing from Bench to Bedside in Bipolar Disorders.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Hypokalemic Hypophosphatemic Thyrotoxic Periodic Paralysis Associated with Bipolar Disorder Therapy.Cureus · 2023Article
- Long-Term Lithium Therapy and Thyroid Disorders in Bipolar Disorder: A Historical Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression: Therapeutic Trends, Challenges and Future Directions.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thyroid hormone (TH) augmentation, although commonly used for major depression, is sparingly used for bipolar disorder (BD) after the failure of mood-stabilizing agents. While the exact mechanisms of thyroid hormone action in BD remains unclear, central thyroid hormone deficit has been postulated as a mechanism for rapid cycling. This systematic review-conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines-of eight studies synthesizes the evidence for TH augmentation in BD. A systematic search of the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCT), open-label trials, and observational studies of levothyroxine (LT4) and triiodothyronine (T3) for BD. Open-label studies of high dose LT4 augmentation for bipolar depression and rapid cycling showed improvement in depression outcomes and reduction in recurrence, respectively. However, an RCT of high-dose LT4 did not show benefit in contrast to placebo. An RCT comparing LT4, T3, and placebo showed benefit only in rapid-cycling bipolar women. A meta-analysis could not be completed due to significant differences in study designs, interventions, and outcomes. Our systematic review shows mixed evidence and a lack of high-quality studies. The initial promise of supratherapeutic LT4 augmentation from open-label trials has not been consistently replicated in RCTs. Limited data are available for T3. The studies did not report significant thyrotoxicosis, and TH augmentation were well tolerated. Therefore, TH augmentation, especially with supratherapeutic doses, should be reserved for highly treatment-resistant bipolar depression and rapid-cycling BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.