Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421609›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Evidence-Based Medicine among Northern Saudi Primary Care Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Bashayer Farhan ALruwaili, Ashokkumar Thirunavukkarasu, Aseel Awad Alsaidan, Aliyah Muteb Al-Ruwaili, Ruqayyah Batel Shati Alanazi, Amal Muhaysin B Alruwaili, Abdullah Odhayb Alruwaili, Afrah Mohaimeed Altaymani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bashayer Farhan ALruwailiDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2034-7709
Ashokkumar ThirunavukkarasuDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.
Aseel Awad AlsaidanDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0220-6160
Aliyah Muteb Al-RuwailiDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Sakaka 73244, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.
Ruqayyah Batel Shati AlanaziDepartment of Family Medicine, Northern Borders General Health Affairs, Arar 73244, Northern Border Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4704-6116
Amal Muhaysin B AlruwailiDepartment of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Sakaka 73244, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Odhayb AlruwailiDepartment of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Sakaka 72345, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.
Afrah Mohaimeed AltaymaniMedical Intern, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence-based practice of primary care physicians is essential because they are the first line of contact with the local community, and they cater to most of their communities’ health needs. In the current study, in which we used a cross-sectional survey in northern Saudi Arabia, we assessed primary care physicians’ knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers regarding evidence-based medicine (EBM). Of the 300 physicians who participated, less than half had high knowledge (43.7%) and attitude (47.7%) toward EBM. The chi-square test revealed that the knowledge categories were significantly associated with the age group (p = 0.002) and EBM training received in the past five years (p < 0.001), and the attitude categories were significantly associated with nationality (p = 0.008). Of the respondents, 155 (51.7%) used EBM in their daily clinical practice. Through logistic regression analysis, we found that the identified predictors of including EBM in clinical practice were the 31−45-year-old age group (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.65−2.73) and EBM training received during last 5 years (AOR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.35−2.94). We recommend enhancing primary care physicians’ knowledge of EBM and its importance in clinical practice through appropriate training programs. A multi-centric mixed-method survey is warranted in other provinces of the KSA to recognize region-specific training demand.

Indexed as

attitudebarriersevidence-based medicineknowledgepracticeSaudi

Identifiers

PMID36421609
PMCPMC9690608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.