Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421589›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Current Concept of Paternal Bonding: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Daichi Suzuki, Yukiko Ohashi, Eriko Shinohara, Yuriko Usui, Fukiko Yamada, Noyuri Yamaji, Kiriko Sasayama, Hitomi Suzuki, Romulo Fernandez Nieva, Katharina da Silva Lopes and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daichi SuzukiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Atsugi 243-0292, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-8536
Yukiko OhashiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Josai International University, Togane 283-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3707-0742
Eriko ShinoharaDepartment of Nursing, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1309-9295
Yuriko UsuiDepartment of Midwifery and Women's Health, Division of Health Sciences & Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6224-5391
Fukiko YamadaDepartment of Midwifery, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.
Noyuri YamajiGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4212-6723
Kiriko SasayamaDepartment of Nursing, Global Health Nursing, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita 286-8686, Japan.
Hitomi SuzukiGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.
Romulo Fernandez NievaGender Studies and Criminology Programme, School of Sociology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Katharina da Silva LopesGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Junko MiyazawaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Josai International University, Togane 283-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-1979
Michiko HasePediatric Nursing, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Musashino University, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8181, Japan.
Minoru KabashimaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Josai International University, Togane 283-8555, Japan.
Erika OtaGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0044, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Number JP21K10833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bonding is crucial to perinatal mental health. Despite an extensive body of literature on maternal bonding, few studies have focused on paternal bonding. This scoping review aimed to clarify the current state of the concept of paternal-infant/fetus bonding. The eligibility criteria were drawn from the population concept and context elements to answer the following questions: "what is paternal bonding?" and "what are the constructs of the concept of paternal bonding?" The review comprised 39 studies. Paternal bonding was associated with both positive and negative paternal behavior and thought and may be determined based on fathers' beliefs and rearing history. Most studies showed that father-child interaction is one of the factors promoting paternal bonding. However, fathers generally felt more distant from their babies post-delivery than mothers. Only a few studies originally defined paternal bonding; most relied on the definitions of maternal bonding. We found different descriptions lacking consensus. Few studies examined the differences between paternal and maternal bonding. No consensus exists on the concept, constructs, and assessment of paternal bonding. The causal relationship between paternal bonding and other variables is unexplored. Future studies should explore fathers' perspectives and experiences, focusing on the unknown aspects of paternal bonding identified in this review.

Indexed as

bonding developmentfather–infant relationshipfatherspaternal bondingscoping review

Identifiers

PMID36421589
PMCPMC9690989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.