Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421498›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Observing Cryptocurrencies through Robust Anomaly Scores.

Geumil Bae, Jang Ho Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Geumil BaeIndustrial and Systems Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Korea.
Jang Ho KimDepartment of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Education BK21 FOURNational Research Foundation of Korea BK21 FOUR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cryptocurrency market is understood as being more volatile than traditional asset classes. Therefore, modeling the volatility of cryptocurrencies is important for making investment decisions. However, large swings in the market might be normal for cryptocurrencies due to their inherent volatility. Deviations, along with correlations of asset returns, must be considered for measuring the degree of market anomaly. This paper demonstrates the use of robust Mahalanobis distances based on shrinkage estimators and minimum covariance determinant for observing anomaly scores of cryptocurrencies. Our analysis shows that anomaly scores are a critical complement to volatility measures for understanding the cryptocurrency market. The use of anomaly scores is further demonstrated through portfolio optimization and scenario analysis.

Indexed as

anomaly scorecryptocurrencyMahalanobis distanceminimum covariance determinantshrinkage estimators

Identifiers

PMID36421498
PMCPMC9689272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.