Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421361›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Improving Genomic Prediction with Machine Learning Incorporating TPE for Hyperparameters Optimization.

Mang Liang, Bingxing An, Keanning Li, Lili Du, Tianyu Deng, Sheng Cao, Yueying Du, Lingyang Xu, Xue Gao, Lupei Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Impact of scale parameter for marker variance prior in some Bayesian whole-genome regression methods.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mang LiangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Bingxing AnInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Keanning LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lili DuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Tianyu DengInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Sheng CaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Yueying DuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lingyang XuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Xue GaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lupei ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7701-2331
Junya LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Huijiang GaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

Technology Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2020GG0210the National Natural Science Foundations of China 31872975the National Natural Science Foundations of China 32172693the Program of National Beef Cattle and Yak Industrial Technology System CARS-37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depending on excellent prediction ability, machine learning has been considered the most powerful implement to analyze high-throughput sequencing genome data. However, the sophisticated process of tuning hyperparameters tremendously impedes the wider application of machine learning in animal and plant breeding programs. Therefore, we integrated an automatic tuning hyperparameters algorithm, tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE), with machine learning to simplify the process of using machine learning for genomic prediction. In this study, we applied TPE to optimize the hyperparameters of Kernel ridge regression (KRR) and support vector regression (SVR). To evaluate the performance of TPE, we compared the prediction accuracy of KRR-TPE and SVR-TPE with the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and KRR-RS, KRR-Grid, SVR-RS, and SVR-Grid, which tuned the hyperparameters of KRR and SVR by using random search (RS) and grid search (Gird) in a simulation dataset and the real datasets. The results indicated that KRR-TPE achieved the most powerful prediction ability considering all populations and was the most convenient. Especially for the Chinese Simmental beef cattle and Loblolly pine populations, the prediction accuracy of KRR-TPE had an 8.73% and 6.08% average improvement compared with GBLUP, respectively. Our study will greatly promote the application of machine learning in GP and further accelerate breeding progress.

Indexed as

genomic predictionhyperparameters optimizationmachine learningtree-structured Parzen estimator

Identifiers

PMID36421361
PMCPMC9688023
OpenAlexW4308972078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.