ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Efficacy of Tuberculosis Treatment in Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis with the Use of Bedaquiline: The Experience of the Russian Federation.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Declining prevalence of multidrug-resistant but comparatively high quinolone-resistant tuberculosis in Heilongjiang Province, China: 2013-2022 trend.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Drug Resistance and Comorbidities in the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of Bedaquiline and Delamanid: New Arsenals Against Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Review
- Assessment of Comorbidity in Patients with Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bacteriophages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, their diversity, and potential therapeutic uses: a review.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the conditions of the continued growth of multiple- and extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis, use of the new highly effective anti-tuberculosis drugs in this patient category is of great relevance. The aim of the study was determination the efficacy of treatment in patients with multidrug- and extensive drug-resistant tuberculosis using bedaquiline based on studies published in the Russian Federation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe authors analyzed data published in studies from 2014 to 2022; 41 publications were included in total and 17 articles corresponded to the study design. The results of treatment of 1404 tuberculosis patients with MDR/XDR TB were described. Bedaquiline was used according to the standard scheme with a description of the treatment results after 24-26 weeks. Treatment efficacy was estimated according to accepted criteria. RESULTS OF THE STUDY: The analysis showed that the treatment efficacy on conversion was achieved in 79.5% of cases (95% Cl 76.5-82.3), and recovery was observed in 82.0% of cases (95% Cl 78.6-85.1). Departure from the therapy was observed in rare cases (9.8%; 95% Cl 7.9-12.2). Deaths were recorded in 6.5% of cases (95% Cl 4.9-8.3), which were associated with the severe disease and concomitant pathology in 74.3%. The development of adverse events was noted in half of the patients (55.7%); however, bedaquiline cancellation occurred in a few cases (7.0%; 95% Cl 3.0-13.0). From analyzing data in patients with MDR and XDR TB, the efficacy of treatment was 89.9% (95% Cl 85.9-93.2) and 71.9% (95% Cl 66.2-77.1), respectively.
conclusionUse of bedaquiline in treatment makes it possible to achieve recovery of patients with MDR/XDR TB in 82.0% of cases with patients dropping out of treatment in 9.8%. At the same time, in patients with MDR TB, recovery was achieved in 89.9% of cases, while in patients with XDR TB, 71.9% of cases recovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.