ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Influence of Rigid-Elastic Artery Wall of Carotid and Coronary Stenosis on Hemodynamics.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the Functional Severity of Carotid Artery Stenosis Using an Image-Based Hemodynamic Modeling Method.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Geometric Determinants of Post-stenotic Energetics in Coarctation of Aorta: Linking Centerline Morphology to Downstream Energy Loss.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Ultrasound biomechanical indices in carotid artery disease: evaluation of shear modulus, circumferential stress, longitudinal stress, and stiffness index-a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comparison of Coupling Strategies for 1D-3D Simulations of Coronary Hemodynamics.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Numerical assessment of arterial punch method and arterial reconstruction in femoral endarterectomy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- An in silico analysis of heart rate impact on wall shear stress hemodynamic parameters in aortic coarctation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of Umbilical Artery Hemodynamics in Development of Intrauterine Growth Restriction Using Computational Fluid Dynamics with Doppler Ultrasound.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Computational Fluid Dynamics in Medicine and Biology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of the efficacy of the porous medium model in hemodynamic analysis of iliac vein compression syndrome.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- CFD Study of the Effect of the Angle Pattern on Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular system abnormalities can result in serious health complications. By using the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) procedure, a comprehensive realistic approach can be employed to accurately investigate blood flow coupled with arterial wall response. The hemodynamics was investigated in both the coronary and carotid arteries based on the arterial wall response. The hemodynamics was estimated based on the numerical simulation of a comprehensive three-dimensional non-Newtonian blood flow model in elastic and rigid arteries. For stenotic right coronary artery (RCA), it was found that the maximum value of wall shear stress (WSS) for the FSI case is higher than the rigid wall. On the other hand, for the stenotic carotid artery (CA), it was found that the maximum value of WSS for the FSI case is lower than the rigid wall. Moreover, at the peak systole of the cardiac cycle (0.38 s), the maximum percentage of arterial wall deformation was found to be 1.9%. On the other hand, for the stenotic carotid artery, the maximum percentage of arterial wall deformation was found to be 0.46%. A comparison between FSI results and those obtained by rigid wall arteries is carried out. Findings indicate slight differences in results for large-diameter arteries such as the carotid artery. Accordingly, the rigid wall assumption is plausible in flow modeling for relatively large diameters such as the carotid artery. Additionally, the FSI approach is essential in flow modeling in small diameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.