Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421083›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Hand Exoskeleton Design and Human-Machine Interaction Strategies for Rehabilitation.

Kang Xia, Xianglei Chen, Xuedong Chang, Chongshuai Liu, Liwei Guo, Xiaobin Xu, Fangrui Lv, Yimin Wang, Han Sun, Jianfang Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advances in Biomechanics-Based Motion Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kang XiaCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Xianglei ChenCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Xuedong ChangCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Chongshuai LiuCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-4350
Liwei GuoArticular Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China.
Xiaobin XuCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6023-1984
Fangrui LvCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Yimin WangArticular Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China.
Han SunArticular Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China.
Jianfang ZhouCollege of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China.
Hohai University · CNSoochow University · CNQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Changzhou Health Commission Technology Projects ZD202103China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2021M690872Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities B210202125National Natural Science Foundation of China 12102127Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20190164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke and related complications such as hemiplegia and disability create huge burdens for human society in the 21st century, which leads to a great need for rehabilitation and daily life assistance. To address this issue, continuous efforts are devoted in human-machine interaction (HMI) technology, which aims to capture and recognize users' intentions and fulfil their needs via physical response. Based on the physiological structure of the human hand, a dimension-adjustable linkage-driven hand exoskeleton with 10 active degrees of freedom (DoFs) and 3 passive DoFs is proposed in this study, which grants high-level synergy with the human hand. Considering the weight of the adopted linkage design, the hand exoskeleton can be mounted on the existing up-limb exoskeleton system, which greatly diminishes the burden for users. Three rehabilitation/daily life assistance modes are developed (namely, robot-in-charge, therapist-in-charge, and patient-in-charge modes) to meet specific personal needs. To realize HMI, a thin-film force sensor matrix and Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) are installed in both the hand exoskeleton and the corresponding controller. Outstanding sensor-machine synergy is confirmed by trigger rate evaluation, Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), and a confusion matrix. To recognize user intention, a genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to search for the optimal hyperparameters of a 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and the average intention-recognition accuracy for the eight actions/gestures examined reaches 97.1% (based on K-fold cross-validation). The hand exoskeleton system provides the possibility for people with limited exercise ability to conduct self-rehabilitation and complex daily activities.

Indexed as

deep learninghand exoskeleton designintention recognitionmachine learningmotion simulationrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36421083
PMCPMC9687420
OpenAlexW4309001471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.