Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36421049›Full record

SynthesisJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2023

Annual Research Review: The impact of Covid-19 on psychopathology in children and young people worldwide: systematic review of studies with pre- and within-pandemic data.

Tamsin Newlove-Delgado, Abigail Emma Russell, Frances Mathews, Lauren Cross, Eleanor Bryant, Rebecca Gudka, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Tamsin J Ford

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The impact of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic on the mental health of scoliosis patients in Germany.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamsin Newlove-DelgadoUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5192-3724
Abigail Emma RussellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-6264
Frances MathewsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Lauren CrossDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Eleanor BryantUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rebecca GudkaUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Obioha C UkoumunneUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Tamsin J FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-4904
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V027751/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high volume and pace of research has posed challenges to researchers, policymakers and practitioners wanting to understand the overall impact of the pandemic on children and young people's mental health. We aimed to search for and review the evidence from epidemiological studies to answer the question: how has mental health changed in the general population of children and young people?

methodsFour databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychINFO) were searched in October 2021, with searches updated in February 2022. We aimed to identify studies of children or adolescents with a mean age of 18 years or younger at baseline, that reported change on a validated mental health measure from prepandemic to during the pandemic. Abstracts and full texts were double-screened against inclusion criteria and quality assessed using a risk of bias tool. Studies were narratively synthesised, and meta-analyses were performed where studies were sufficiently similar.

results6917 records were identified, and 51 studies included in the review. Only four studies had a rating of high quality. Studies were highly diverse in terms of design, setting, timing in relation to the pandemic, population, length of follow-up and choice of measure. Methodological heterogeneity limited the potential to conduct meta-analyses across studies. Whilst the evidence suggested a slight deterioration on some measures, overall, the findings were mixed, with no clear pattern emerging.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the need for a more harmonised approach to research in this field. Despite the sometimes-inconsistent results of our included studies, the evidence supports existing concerns about the impact of Covid-19 on children's mental health and on services for this group, given that even small changes can have a significant impact on provision at population level. Children and young people must be prioritised in pandemic recovery, and explicitly considered in planning for any future pandemic response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersAdolescentChildHumansMental HealthPandemicschildrenCovid-19mental healthpandemicyoung people

Identifiers

PMID36421049
PMCPMC10952503
OpenAlexW4309899988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.