Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420972›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

A simplified and effective off-axis Winston-Lutz for single-isocenter multi-target SRS.

Anton Eagle, Mike Tallhamer, Justin Keener, Sarah Geneser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.b: SRS-SBRT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Off-iso Winston-Lutz test on seven linear accelerators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anton EagleCentura Health, Longmont United Hospital, Hope Cancer Care Center, Longmont, Colorado, USA.
Mike TallhamerCentura Health, Parker Adventist Hospital, Parker, Colorado, USA.
Justin KeenerCentura Health, Littleton Adventist Hospital, Littleton, Colorado, USA.
Sarah GeneserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo safely perform single-iso multi-target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), clinics must demonstrate SRS delivery accuracy for off-axis targets. The traditional Winston-Lutz (W-L) was widely adopted because it provides a simple and accurate solution for testing radiation-isocenter coincidence that uses a static target, enables testing arbitrary treatment angles, and does not require expensive commercial phantoms. The current noncommercial tests are cumbersome and insufficiently accurate. For an off-axis Winston-Lutz (OAWL) test, one must design MLC fields centered on off-axis targets. Unfortunately, because MLC leaf-interfaces are often misaligned with the target center, accomplishing this presents a nontrivial geometry problem that has not been previously solved in the literature. We present a solution for evaluating SIMT SRS accuracy that provides a straightforward method for creating OAWL test fields and offers all the benefits of the standard W-L test.

methodsWe have developed a method to use any gantry, table, and initial collimator angles to create OAWL fields. This method calculates a series of nested coordinate transformations that produce a small collimator angle adjustment to align the MLC and create a symmetric field around an off-axis target.

resultsFor an 8 cm off-axis target, the described method yields OAWL results within 0.07 mm of standard isocentric W-L results. Our six most recent isocentric W-L tests show max and mean errors of 0.59 and 0.37 mm, respectively. For six runs of our proposed OAWL test, the average max and mean errors are 0.66 and 0.40 mm, respectively.

conclusionThis method accurately evaluates SRS delivery accuracy for off-axis distances that span the majority of a typical human brain for a centered SIMT arc. We have made this method publicly available, so that physicists can employ it within their clinics, foregoing the need for expensive phantoms and improving access to the state-of-the-art SIMT SRS technique.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryHumansParticle AcceleratorsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSIMTSRSWinston-Lutz

Identifiers

PMID36420972
PMCPMC9924106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.