ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi-leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluations of Penumbra Reduction Using Multi-Leaf Collimator and 3D Bolus in Scanned Proton Therapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Enhancing proton therapy for superficial lesions using patient-specific bolus and multi-leaf collimator.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Dosimetric comparison of scanned proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy in isodose-prescribed stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Enhancing dose conformity in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy using a novel dynamic multi-leaf collimator strategy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Beam commissioning of a new compact scanned proton therapy system with four different dose calculation algorithms.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Comparative Dosimetric Analysis of Jaw Tracking Versus Non-Jaw Tracking Techniques in Head and Neck and Brain Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advanced biomedical research · 2026Review
- Survey and profile data on particle therapy technology in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Commissioning of respiratory-gated 4D dynamic dose calculations for various gating widths without spot timestamp in proton pencil beam scanning.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The LET enhancement of energy-specific collimation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi-leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical beam commissioning results and lateral penumbra characteristics of our new pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) calculated by use of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. Eighteen collimated uniform dose plans for cubic targets were optimized by the RayStation 9A treatment planning system (TPS), varying scan area, modulation widths, measurement depths, and collimator angles. To test the patient-specific measurements, we also created and verified five clinically realistic PBS plans with the MLC, such as the liver, prostate, base-of-skull, C-shape, and head-and-neck. The verification measurements consist of the depth dose (DD), lateral profile (LP), and absolute dose (AD). We compared the LPs and ADs between the calculation and measurements. For the cubic plans, the gamma index pass rates (γ-passing) were on average 96.5% ± 4.0% at 3%/3 mm for the DD and 95.2% ± 7.6% at 2%/2 mm for the LP. In several LP measurements less than 75 mm depths, the γ-passing deteriorated (increased the measured doses) by less than 90% with the scattering such as the MLC edge and range shifter. The deteriorated γ-passing was satisfied by more than 90% at 2%/2 mm using uncollimated beams instead of collimated beams except for three planes. The AD differences and the lateral penumbra width (80%-20% distance) were within ±1.9% and ± 1.1 mm, respectively. For the clinical plan measurements, the γ-passing of LP at 2%/2 mm and the AD differences were 97.7% ± 4.2% on average and within ±1.8%, respectively. The measurements were in good agreement with the calculations of both the cubic and clinical plans inserted in the MLC except for LPs less than 75 mm regions of some cubic and clinical plans. The calculation errors in collimated beams can be mitigated by substituting uncollimated beams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.