Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420950›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2023

Psychosocial risk factors for low back pain in US workers: Data from the 2002-2018 quality of work life survey.

Haiou Yang, Ming-Lun Lu, Scott Haldeman, Naomi Swanson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07583368 (Chronic Pain, Emotions and Professional Football), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07583368 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Chronic Pain, Emotions and Professional Football

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorEvidence In MotionRan2025 to 2026Enrolled32ConditionsChronic Pain, Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)ArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. BACK-on-LINEEuropean journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Does Pain Explain Trends in Disability? An Analysis of Middle-Aged and Older U.S. Adults, 2002-2018.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bidirectional Comorbid Associations between Back Pain and Major Depression in US Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Haiou YangSpecialist, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Ming-Lun LuNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Scott HaldemanDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Naomi SwansonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology · CA

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExamining workplace psychosocial risk factors for back pain becomes increasingly important because of the changing nature of work and rising healthcare costs. Some psychosocial risk factors for back pain, such as work and family imbalance, exposure to a hostile work environment, and job insecurity, are understudied for the working population in the United States.

methodsData used in this study came from the Quality of Work Life Survey (QWL), a supplementary module of the General Social Survey conducted in the United States. Data from the 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018 QWL surveys were used in these analyses, giving a total sample size of 6661. Five domains of workplace psychosocial risk factors for back pain were examined, including job strain, low social support, work-family imbalance, exposure to a hostile work environment (harassment and discrimination), and job insecurity. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of each psychosocial risk factor for back pain with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model after controlling for job physical factors, occupation, and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

resultsSignificant associations were found between back pain and several psychosocial factors including job strain (aOR 1.19; CI 1.00,1.41), work-family imbalance (aOR,1.42; CI 1.22,1.64), harassment (aOR 1.40; CI 1.15,1.71), and discrimination (aOR 1.20 CI 1.00,1.44).

conclusionThis study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between a variety of workplace psychosocial factors and back pain. Our findings suggest directions in future longitudinal research to examine emerging workplace psychosocial factors for back pain.

Indexed as

Low Back PainBack PainHumansOccupationsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkplaceback painhostile work environmentjob insecurityjob strainpsychosolcial stressorwork-family imbalance

Identifiers

PMID36420950
PMCPMC10123870
OpenAlexW4309833981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.