Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420918›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug delivery2023

Nanoparticle-based drug delivery for the treatment of traumatic brain injury.

Farrah S Mohammed, Sacit Bulent Omay, Kevin N Sheth, Jiangbing Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug delivery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Peptide CAQK: Properties, Applications, and Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for traumatic brain injury.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  4. Sequential release ofMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Nano-delivery platforms for bacterial gene transformation: suitability and challenges.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farrah S MohammedDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6084-7751
Sacit Bulent OmayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kevin N ShethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jiangbing ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1201-5360

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Improved glyburide therapy via acid- triggered release functional nanoparticles and therapeutic imagingR01NS110721 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHETH, KEVIN NAVIN, ZHOU, JIANGBING · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraumatic brain injuries (TBIs) impact the breadth of society and remain without any approved pharmacological treatments. Despite successful Phase II clinical trials, the failure of many Phase III clinical trials may be explained by insufficient drug targeting and retention, preventing the proper attainment of an observable dosage threshold. To address this challenge, nanoparticles can be functionalized to protect pharmacological payloads, improve targeted drug delivery to sites of injury, and can be combined with supportive scaffolding to improve secondary outcomes. AREAS COVERED: This review briefly covers the pathophysiology of TBIs and their subtypes, the current pre-clinical and clinical management strategies, explores the common models of focal, diffuse, and mixed traumatic brain injury employed in experimental animals, and surveys the existing literature on nanoparticles developed to treat TBIs. EXPERT OPINION: Nanoparticles are well suited to improve secondary outcomes as their multifunctionality and customizability enhance their potential for efficient targeted delivery, payload protection, increased brain penetration, low off-target toxicity, and biocompatibility in both acute and chronic timescales.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticNanoparticlesAnimalsBrainDrug Delivery Systemsdrug deliverynanoparticlesneural engineeringTBI

Identifiers

PMID36420918
PMCPMC9983310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.