Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420910›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2022

Evaluation of 10-minute post-injection 11C-PiB PET and its correlation with 18F-FDG PET in older adults who are cognitively healthy, mildly impaired, or with probable Alzheimer's disease.

Camila de Godoi Carneiro, Daniele de Paula Faria, Artur Martins Coutinho, Carla Rachel Ono, Fábio Luis de Souza Duran, Naomi Antunes da Costa, Alexandre Teles Garcez, Paula Squarzoni da Silveira, Orestes Vicente Forlenza, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camila de Godoi CarneiroLaboratório de Medicina Nuclear (LIM 43), Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Daniele de Paula FariaLaboratório de Medicina Nuclear (LIM 43), Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia, Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Artur Martins CoutinhoLaboratório de Medicina Nuclear (LIM 43), Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carla Rachel OnoLaboratório de Medicina Nuclear (LIM 43), Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fábio Luis de Souza DuranLaboratório Neuro-Imagem em Psiquiatria (LIM 21), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Naomi Antunes da CostaLaboratório Neuro-Imagem em Psiquiatria (LIM 21), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Teles GarcezLaboratório de Medicina Nuclear (LIM 43), Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paula Squarzoni da SilveiraLaboratório Neuro-Imagem em Psiquiatria (LIM 21), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Orestes Vicente ForlenzaLaboratório de Neurociências (LIM 27), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sonia Maria Dozzi BruckiDepartamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo NitriniDepartamento de Neurologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Geraldo BusattoLaboratório Neuro-Imagem em Psiquiatria (LIM 21), Departamento de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Alberto BuchpiguelLaboratório de Medicina Nuclear (LIM 43), Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2012/50329-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePositron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo evaluation of molecular targets in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease. Mild cognitive impairment is an intermediate stage between normal cognition and Alzheimer-type dementia. In vivo fibrillar amyloid-beta can be detected in PET using [11C]-labeled Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB). In contrast, [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) is a neurodegeneration biomarker used to evaluate cerebral glucose metabolism, indicating neuronal injury and synaptic dysfunction. In addition, early cerebral uptake of amyloid-PET tracers can determine regional cerebral blood flow. The present study compared early-phase 11C-PiB and 18F-FDG in older adults without cognitive impairment, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease.

methodsWe selected 90 older adults, clinically classified as healthy controls, with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, or with probable Alzheimer's disease, who underwent an 18F-FDG PET, early-phase 11C-PiB PET and magnetic resonance imaging. All participants were also classified as amyloid-positive or -negative in late-phase 11C-PiB. The data were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping.

resultsWe found that the probable Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment group had lower early-phase 11C-PiB uptake in limbic structures than 18F-FDG uptake. The images showed significant interactions between amyloid-beta status (negative or positive). However, early-phase 11C-PiB appears to provide different information from 18F-FDG about neurodegeneration.

conclusionsOur study suggests that early-phase 11C-PiB uptake correlates with 18F-FDG, irrespective of the particular amyloid-beta status. In addition, we observed distinct regional distribution patterns between both biomarkers, reinforcing the need for more robust studies to investigate the real clinical value of early-phase amyloid-PET imaging.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsBrainCarbon RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyThiazoles2-(4'-(methylamino)phenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazoleAmyloid beta-PeptidesAniline CompoundsCarbon-11Carbon RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Thiazoles[11C]-labeled Pittsburgh compound B[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucoseagingamyloidcerebral glucose metabolismneuroimagingperfusionPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID36420910
PMCPMC9561831
OpenAlexW4310330303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.