Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420768›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Co-designing an intervention to improve the process of deprescribing for older people living with frailty in the United Kingdom.

Jonathan Silcock, Iuri Marques, Janice Olaniyan, David K Raynor, Helen Baxter, Nicky Gray, Syed T R Zaidi, George Peat, Beth Fylan, Liz Breen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Supporting Older People Living With Frailty to Self-Manage Multiple Medicines: An Experience-Based Co-Design of a Complex Intervention Developed in UK Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Navigating Workforce Challenges in Long-Term Care: A Co-Design Approach to Solutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Consumer Involvement in the Design and Development of Medication Safety Interventions or Services in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  11. Co-designing an intervention to improve the process of deprescribing for older people living with frailty in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jonathan SilcockSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-9249
Iuri MarquesSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Janice OlaniyanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
David K RaynorSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Helen BaxterAlliance Manchester Business School, Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nicky GrayDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Syed T R ZaidiHPS Pharmacies, EBOS Group, Docklands, Victoria, Australia.
George PeatDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Beth FylanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0599-4537
Liz BreenSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-1187
Jonathan BennNIHR Yorkshire and the Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
David P AlldredNIHR Yorkshire and the Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn older people living with frailty, polypharmacy can lead to preventable harm like adverse drug reactions and hospitalization. Deprescribing is a strategy to reduce problematic polypharmacy. All stakeholders should be actively involved in developing a person-centred deprescribing process that involves shared decision-making.

objectiveTo co-design an intervention, supported by a logic model, to increase the engagement of older people living with frailty in the process of deprescribing.

designExperience-based co-design is an approach to service improvement, which uses service users and providers to identify problems and design solutions. This was used to create a person-centred intervention with the potential to improve the quality and outcomes of the deprescribing process. A 'trigger film' showing older people talking about their healthcare experiences was created and facilitated discussions about current problems in the deprescribing process. Problems were then prioritized and appropriate solutions were developed. The review located the solutions in the context of current processes and procedures. An ideal care pathway and a complex intervention to deliver better care were developed. SETTING AND

participantsOlder people living with frailty, their informal carers and professionals living and/or working in West Yorkshire, England, UK. Deprescribing was considered in the context of primary care.

resultsThe current deprescribing process differed from an ideal pathway. A complex intervention containing seven elements was required to move towards the ideal pathway. Three of these elements were prototyped and four still need development. The complex intervention responded to priorities about (a) clarity for older people about what was happening at all stages in the deprescribing process and (b) the quality of one-to-one consultations.

conclusionsPriorities for improving the current deprescribing process were successfully identified. Solutions were developed and structured as a complex intervention. Further work is underway to (a) complete the prototyping of the intervention and (b) conduct feasibility testing. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Older people living with frailty (and their informal carers) have made a central contribution, as collaborators, to ensure that a complex intervention has the greatest possible potential to enhance the experience of deprescribing medicines.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsFrailtyAgedCaregiversHumansPolypharmacyUnited Kingdomageddeprescribingfrailtypolypharmacyprimary health carereferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID36420768
PMCPMC9854320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.