Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420703›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2023

Impact of maximal extent of resection on postoperative deficits, patient functioning, and survival within clinically important glioblastoma subgroups.

Jasper K W Gerritsen, Rosa H Zwarthoed, John L Kilgallon, Noah Lee Nawabi, Georges Versyck, Charissa A C Jessurun, Koen P Pruijn, Fleur L Fisher, Emma Larivière, Lien Solie and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasper K W GerritsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-865X
Rosa H ZwarthoedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John L KilgallonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Noah Lee NawabiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Georges VersyckDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Charissa A C JessurunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Koen P PruijnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Fleur L FisherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Emma LarivièreDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lien SolieDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rania A MekaryDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Djaina D SatoerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost W SchoutenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eelke M BosDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alfred KloetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Rishi Nandoe TewarieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Timothy R SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clemens M F DirvenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven De VleeschouwerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Arnaud J P E VincentDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marike L D BroekmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USErasmus MC · NLKU Leuven · BEMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of extent of resection (EOR), residual tumor volume (RTV), and gross-total resection (GTR) in glioblastoma subgroups is currently unknown. This study aimed to analyze their impact on patient subgroups in relation to neurological and functional outcomes.

methodsPatients with tumor resection for eloquent glioblastoma between 2010 and 2020 at 4 tertiary centers were recruited from a cohort of 3919 patients.

resultsOne thousand and forty-seven (1047) patients were included. Higher EOR and lower RTV were significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across all subgroups, but RTV was a stronger prognostic factor. GTR based on RTV improved median OS in the overall cohort (19.0 months, P < .0001), and in the subgroups with IDH wildtype tumors (18.5 months, P = .00055), MGMT methylated tumors (35.0 months, P < .0001), aged <70 (20.0 months, P < .0001), NIHSS 0-1 (19.0 months, P = .0038), KPS 90-100 (19.5 months, P = .0012), and KPS ≤80 (17.0 months, P = .036). GTR was significantly associated with improved OS in the overall cohort (HR 0.58, P = .0070) and improved PFS in the NIHSS 0-1 subgroup (HR 0.47, P = .012). GTR combined with preservation of neurological function (OFO 1 grade) yielded the longest survival times (median OS 22.0 months, P < .0001), which was significantly more frequently achieved in the awake mapping group (50.0%) than in the asleep group (21.8%) (P < .0001).

conclusionsMaximum resection was especially beneficial in the subgroups aged <70, NIHSS 0-1, and KPS 90-100 without increasing the risk of postoperative NIHSS or KPS worsening. These findings may assist surgical decision making in individual glioblastoma patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective Studiesextent of resectionglioblastomagross-total resectionpostoperative deficitssurvival

Identifiers

PMID36420703
PMCPMC10158118
OpenAlexW4309933939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.