ArticleJournal of genetics2022
Accelerating imputation of missing genotypes using parallel computing.
Article in Journal of genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to massive jump in DNA technology, large-scale genomic datasets, including valuable information, have become available. While this is a prodigious opportunity, and it can also be a big challenge because analysing these large datasets with current computers and software tools is very difficult and may take days or even weeks to complete. Novel approaches such as parallel computing have been suggested to deal with these large datasets. Here, the effect of parallel computing on the performance of random forest (RF) algorithm for imputation of missing genotypes was studied. To this end, the genotypic matrices were simulated for, respectively, 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 500, 1000 and 2000 individuals, respectively. Then, 50% of genotypic information was masked and imputed by RF. The per cent of genotypes correctly imputed was used to measure accuracy of genotype imputation. Serial and parallel computing were applied to the data. In comparison to serial computing, parallel computing did not affect the accuracy of imputation, and the accuracy was the same in both scenarios. However, regarding computational time, parallel computing accelerated the analyses significantly in a way that it reduced the running time up to 63%. This was due to the fact that in the serial computing, only 10% of the processing power of the central processing unit (CPU) of the machine was used by the RF, while in the parallel computing, 55% of the processing power of the CPU was utilized. Therefore, as parallel computing significantly reduced the computing time and does not affect the accuracy of the results, this approach should be exploited by researchers to analyse large genomic datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36420627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.