Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420359›Full record

ReviewJournal of oncology2022

The Impact of intra-abdominal Pressure on Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yuan Yang, Yushan Duan, Xiaohong Wan, Linjun Wan, Gang Wang, Jianlin Shao

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anesthesia for robot-assisted surgery: a review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-2182
Yushan DuanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-0431
Xiaohong WanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-7535
Linjun WanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6044-3477
Jianlin ShaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-7396
Kunming Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on perioperative outcomes in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science, Embase, and CNKI databases systematically, and the retrieval date was from the inception of the databases to April 2022. Randomized controlled trials on high intraabdominal pressure (HIAP) and low intraabdominal pressure (LIAP) in RARP were included. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software (version 5.3). Results: Six studies involving 2,271 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with patients who experienced HIAP, those who experienced LIAP had a lower incidence of postoperative ileus (POI) (risk ratio (RR): 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24 to 0.72; Conclusion: Our study of published trials indicates that using LIAP during RARP may reduce the incidence of POI, and there were no differences in terms of hematoma, positive margin rate, urinary retention, operative time, or intraoperative blood loss.

Identifiers

PMID36420359
PMCPMC9678446
OpenAlexW4309147435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.