Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420346›Full record

ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2022

Maim, death cases following the installation of vascular access devices filed with specialized forensic medicine commissions of Tehran, Iran, 2013-2018, (A descriptive study).

Fares Najari, Jalaluddin Khoshnevis, Zahra Javaheri, Dorsa Najari, Sahar Mirzaei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fares NajariClinical Research Development Center of Shohada-ye-Tajrish Hospital, Vice- Chancellor in Research Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jalaluddin KhoshnevisClinical Research Development Center of Shohada-ye-Tajrish Hospital, Vice- Chancellor in Research Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra JavaheriClinical Research Development Center of Shohada-ye-Tajrish Hospital, Vice- Chancellor in Research Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dorsa NajariClinical Research Development Center of Shohada-ye-Tajrish Hospital, Vice- Chancellor in Research Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sahar MirzaeiClinical Research Development Center of Shohada-ye-Tajrish Hospital, Vice- Chancellor in Research Affairs, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implantation of vascular access devices is of great importance in critically ill patients or those vulnerable to clinical worsening. The aim of this study was to identify the complications of implantation of vascular access leading to complaints from patients, in the forensic medicine commissions of Tehran. Methods: The present descriptive-cross sectional study was performed on all cases that died from implantation of vascular access devices and complaints about permanent local complications caused by this procedure, filed with the forensic medicine commissions of Tehran in period of 2013-2018, based on selected variables, and the results were statistically analyzed using the chi-square and Fisher exact tests in SPSS Version 18. A p-value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results: All alleged deaths were due to implantation of central venous port placed in a large vein in the neck, and most organ failure cases were attributed to anterior forearm deformity. The most common cause of death was acute cardiac death; internal bleeding was observed in 14% of them. Most complaints of death were filed against general surgery and anesthesia assistants, and most complaints about peripheral venipuncture were against trainee nurses. The present study findings were significantly different in terms of cannulation site, age, cause of death, type of local complication (p<0.01). Conclusion: This study shows, as patients become more aware, complaints from physicians about implantation of vascular access, in the judicial authority are also on the rise. Therefore, in choosing these patients, Venice should be treated more carefully.

Indexed as

Central venous cathetersJudicialLegal medicineMalpractice

Identifiers

PMID36420346
PMCPMC9659835
OpenAlexW4310330302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.