SynthesisJournal of medicine and life2022
The association of thrombophilia in women with severe obstetric complications.
Synthesis in Journal of medicine and life, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombophilia, where multiple genetic and acquired risk factors interact synergistically, are associated with thrombosis and pregnancy-related complications. Despite being studied profusely, an inconsistent association exists between thrombophilia and pregnancy complications. Between 2018 and 2020, ninety-three women with pregnancy complications were enrolled in the study. Twenty-five healthy pregnant women without pregnancy complications reported to the same hospital were also recruited as controls. Blood samples were tested for homocysteine, coagulation studies, and molecular diagnosis included FVL, PTH and MTHFR genes amplified using PCR strip assay (Vienna Lab Diagnostics, Austria). Other thrombophilia screening, including testing for AT, PC, and LA, were done by chromogenic assays (Dade Diagnostica, Munich, Germany). Homocysteine level was determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay technology (Axsym, Abbot company, Germany). Overall, 29.03% of women with pregnancy complications had thrombophilia relative to 16% in the control group. However, the difference between the case and control groups did not reach a significant level (p=0.1175). Additionally, combined thrombophilia was more prevalent among cases (10.75%) than in the control group (4%). However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.1046). Our study demonstrated that the frequency of thrombophilia among healthy women was 16%, and among women with pregnancy-related complications, 29%. Relative to control, all measured thrombophilia markers were more frequent in women with pregnancy-related complications except for LA. Including all the studies on the Saudi population in a meta-analysis study could reveal more information about thrombophilia and pregnancy-related complications in our population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.