Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Distinction of early complement classical and lectin pathway activation

Lisa Hurler, Erik J M Toonen, Erika Kajdácsi, Bregje van Bree, Ricardo J M G E Brandwijk, Wieke de Bruin, Paul A Lyons, Laura Bergamaschi, Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease-National Institute of Health Research (CITIID-NIHR) COVID BioResource Collaboration, György Sinkovits and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Africanized honeybee venom (Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lisa HurlerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Erik J M ToonenResearch and Development Department, Hycult Biotech, Uden, Netherlands.
Erika KajdácsiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bregje van BreeResearch and Development Department, Hycult Biotech, Uden, Netherlands.
Ricardo J M G E BrandwijkResearch and Development Department, Hycult Biotech, Uden, Netherlands.
Wieke de BruinResearch and Development Department, Hycult Biotech, Uden, Netherlands.
Paul A LyonsCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Laura BergamaschiCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease-National Institute of Health Research (CITIID-NIHR) COVID BioResource Collaboration
György SinkovitsDepartment of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
László CervenakDepartment of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Reinhard WürznerInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Zoltán ProhászkaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUHycult Biotech (Netherlands) · NLMRC Epidemiology Unit · GBInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most commonly used markers to assess complement activation are split products that are produced through activation of all three pathways and are located downstream of C3. In contrast, C4d derives from the cleavage of C4 and indicates either classical (CP) or lectin pathway (LP) activation. Although C4d is perfectly able to distinguish between CP/LP and alternative pathway (AP) activation, no well-established markers are available to differentiate between early CP and LP activation. Active enzymes of both pathways (C1s/C1r for the CP, MASP-1/MASP-2 for the LP) are regulated by C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) through the formation of covalent complexes. Aim of this study was to develop validated immunoassays detecting C1s/C1-INH and MASP-1/C1-INH complex levels. Measurement of the complexes reveals information about the involvement of the respective pathways in complement-mediated diseases. Two sandwich ELISAs detecting C1s/C1-INH and MASP-1/C1-INH complex were developed and tested thoroughly, and it was investigated whether C1s/C1-INH and MASP-1/C1-INH complexes could serve as markers for either early CP or LP activation. In addition, a reference range for these complexes in healthy adults was defined, and the assays were clinically validated utilizing samples of 414 COVID-19 patients and 96 healthy controls. The immunoassays can reliably measure C1s/C1-INH and MASP-1/C1-INH complex concentrations in EDTA plasma from healthy and diseased individuals. Both complex levels are increased in serum when activated with zymosan, making them suitable markers for early classical and early lectin pathway activation. Furthermore, measurements of C1-INH complexes in 96 healthy adults showed normally distributed C1s/C1-INH complex levels with a physiological concentration of 1846 ± 1060 ng/mL (mean ± 2SD) and right-skewed distribution of MASP-1/C1-INH complex levels with a median concentration of 36.9 (13.18 - 87.89) ng/mL (2.5-97.5 percentile range), while levels of both complexes were increased in COVID-19 patients (p<0.0001). The newly developed assays measure C1-INH complex levels in an accurate way. C1s/C1-INH and MASP-1/C1-INH complexes are suitable markers to assess early classical and lectin pathway activation. An initial reference range was set and first studies showed that these markers have added value for investigating and unraveling complement activation in human disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mannose-Binding Protein-Associated Serine ProteasesAdultComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinComplement System ProteinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLectinsComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinComplement System ProteinsLectinsMannose-Binding Protein-Associated Serine Proteasesassay development and validationC1-INH complexesC1s/C1-INH complexclassical pathway activationearly complement activationlectin pathway activationMASP-1/C1-INH complex

Identifiers

PMID36420270
PMCPMC9677118
OpenAlexW4309005728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.