Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36420246›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Assessment of Virtual Peer Learning by Peer Feedback: A Pilot Project.

Nachappa Sivanesan Uthraraj, Nina Mary Charles, Sean M Garcia, Annis Maatough, Fitzgerald Anazor, Sumathi Krishnamurthy, Laya Manasa Sriraam, Kannaki Chettiakkapalayam Venkatachalam, Jai Relwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nachappa Sivanesan UthrarajTrauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
Nina Mary CharlesCritical Care, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, GBR.
Sean M GarciaTrauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
Annis MaatoughTrauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
Fitzgerald AnazorTrauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.
Sumathi KrishnamurthyGeneral Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences (UCMS) and Guru Teg Bahadur (GTB) Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Laya Manasa SriraamOtolaryngology, Kanchi Kamakoti Childs Trust Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Kannaki Chettiakkapalayam VenkatachalamReproductive Medicine, The Fertility Center, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital (KMCH), Coimbatore, IND.
Jai RelwaniTrauma and Orthopedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Virtual learning has become the preferred modality for health education during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Peer learning is gaining a lot of significance lately and has been successfully tested in various settings. We combined virtual delivery of health education with peer-assisted learning and evaluated the effectiveness using peer-generated feedback and tested the effectiveness of the model for different cohorts. Methods We performed this study as part of a formal educational course on Health Professions Education. The educators were volunteers from different informal multi-disciplinary groups, working in varied healthcare settings, globally. This involved eight teaching sessions which were delivered virtually and the feedback was recorded as responses to six items (questions), which the learners graded on the Likert scale. The average for each item and the larger domains was then calculated and analyzed.  Results The feedback was provided by all the participants (53/53). In the feedback received item-wise, the best average rating was for legibility of the slides (4.8). The least rating was for adequate checking and assessment of prior knowledge (4.2). In terms of the broader domains, the best feedback was for the teaching material (4.6) and the lowest was for the planning of the sessions (4.4). Overall, the ratings for the domains and the items were above 3 on a scale of 1-5. Conclusions Virtual delivery of healthcare education, facilitated by peer-assisted learning, is an effective model for health education when delivered for a small group, as evidenced by the overall peer feedback. This model can be tested for larger cohorts in the future.

Indexed as

likert scalepeer-assisted learningpeer feedbacksmall group teachingvirtual learning

Identifiers

PMID36420246
PMCPMC9679450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.