ArticleCureus2022
Circumcision With the Plastibell Technique: A Descriptive Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Plastibell technique is one of the most commonly performed procedures used for male circumcision (MC) and is in practice throughout the world. It is a procedure done under local anaesthesia, mostly on infants. The results of the technique have been evaluated in many studies throughout the world. We have done a series of cases and present the results of our retrospective descriptive study. The objective of this study was to describe the outcomes of circumcision performed via the Plastibell technique. Materials and methods This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the Surgical A Unit, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar from July 2013 to June 2021. Clinical records of the infants who underwent circumcision were collected. Infants under the age of six months brought by their parents were included in the study. Infants whose parents requested methods other than Plastibell and infants with bleeding disorders or a family history of such disorders were excluded from the study. The indication for circumcision was for religious reasons in all cases. Post-operative complications were noted in all cases. Results A total of 364 male babies under the age of six months (mean age 43.5±15 days) underwent circumcision with the Plastibell technique. The mean operative time was 11.3±3.7 minutes. The time it took for the ring to fall off was 7.8±3.04 days. In one case, primary haemorrhage required exploration and diathermy of the bleeder. Oedema occurred in 76(20.8%) of the babies. Adhesions of the foreskin with the glans were formed in 3(0.82%) cases. Conclusion Male circumcision is one of the oldest surgical procedures performed. Several methods are in practise in this regard. The results of our study showed that circumcision with the Plastibell method is safe and has fewer side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.