ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Improved inter-residue contact prediction via a hybrid generative model and dynamic loss function.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MAKA-Map: Real-Valued Distance Prediction for Protein Folding Mechanisms via a Hybrid Neural Framework Integrating the Mamba and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- AI-driven insights into protein misfolding and innate immunity in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Assessing the relation between protein phosphorylation, AlphaFold3 models, and conformational variability.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Non-Destructive Detection of Chilled Mutton Freshness Using a Dual-Branch Hierarchical Spectral Feature-Aware Network.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Freeprotmap: waiting-free prediction method for protein distance map.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein contact maps represent spatial pairwise inter-residue interactions, providing a protein's translationally and rotationally invariant topological representation. Accurate contact map prediction has been a critical driving force for improving protein structure determination. Contact maps can also be used as a stand-alone tool for varied applications such as prediction of protein-protein interactions, structure-aware thermal stability or physicochemical properties. We develop a novel hybrid contact map prediction model, CGAN-Cmap, that uses a generative adversarial neural network embedded with a series of modified squeeze and excitation residual networks. To exploit features of different dimensions, we introduce two parallel modules. This architecture improves the prediction by increasing receptive fields, surpassing redundant features and encouraging more meaningful ones from 1D and 2D inputs. We also introduce a new custom dynamic binary cross-entropy loss function to address the input imbalance problem for highly sparse long-range contacts in proteins with insufficient homologs. We evaluate the model's performance on CASP 11, 12, 13, 14, and CAMEO test sets. CGAN-Cmap outperforms state-of-the-art models, improving precision of medium and long-range contacts by at least 3.5%. As a direct assessment between our model and AlphaFold2, the leading available protein structure prediction model, we compare extracted contact maps from AlphaFold2 and predicted contact maps from CGAN-Cmap. The results show that CGAN-Cmap has a mean precision higher by 1% compared to AlphaFold2 for most ranges of contacts. These results demonstrate an efficient approach for highly accurate contact map prediction toward accurate characterization of protein structure, properties and functions from sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.